Bug#808880: Package uploaded

2016-01-30 Thread Ian Cordasco
> That's not the only problem. Betamax will (and currently is) an imporant dependency of OpenStack packages. It doesn't seem that important to me. It's currently been added as a *test* dependency and it's only in *one* project (http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=betamax&i=nope&files=&repos=). Yes

Bug#808880: Package uploaded

2016-01-30 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 01/30/2016 11:57 PM, Daniele Tricoli wrote: > To reply to your question: the only problem I see here is that you can't push > commit on DPMT repositories, right? That's not the only problem. Betamax will (and currently is) an imporant dependency of OpenStack packages. Meaning that having it to

Bug#808880: Package uploaded

2016-01-30 Thread Daniele Tricoli
Hello Thomas, sorry for this late reply, this new year started with a lot of things to do! On Thu, 14 Jan 2016 15:15:59 +0800 Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > Since I've seen no progress in this RFS, that the latest keystoneauth1 > needs it (which blocked me), and I know Paultag is a busy person,

Bug#808880: Package uploaded

2016-01-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, Since I've seen no progress in this RFS, that the latest keystoneauth1 needs it (which blocked me), and I know Paultag is a busy person, I have sponsored the upload of this package. However, I still didn't get a reply on the important topic which I raise: why not pushing this package to the P