Hi,
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:13:54AM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> May I suggest debian-cd-live or debian-live-cd as a name? That would
> be close in name to debian-cd, highlighting its use case.
I would advise against these suggestions, because using debian in the name of a
loosely-coupl
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 11:23:10PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 14120 March 1977, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> > It is worth noting that live-build is not a Debian project, it is an
> > external project that claims to be an official Debian project. This is
> > something that needs to be fixed.
>
Greetings,
On Sun, Nov 8, 2015 at 5:45 PM, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is worth noting that live-build is not a Debian project, it is an
> external project that claims to be an official Debian project. This is
> something that needs to be fixed.
>
> There is no namespace issue, we are
On 14120 March 1977, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> It is worth noting that live-build is not a Debian project, it is an
> external project that claims to be an official Debian project. This is
> something that needs to be fixed.
It is worth noting that you do not declare such things. Such an attitude
To further cloud the issue, the Debian website still links to the Debian
Live project's website as the source of their live images.
Is there more than this one rude individual saying the Debian Live project
is being replaced?
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:59 AM, chals wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 a
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 1:32 PM, Daniel Baumann
wrote:
>
> but given the situation, i understand that argueing about this hijack is
> futile then.
>
> it would have been more honest to actually talk to us (we're doing this
> since almost 10 years now), and take over live-* packages directly,
> rath
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Iain R. Learmonth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is worth noting that live-build is not a Debian project, it is an
> external project that claims to be an official Debian project. This is
> something that needs to be fixed.
>
> There is no namespace issue, we are building on
Hello,
Speaking as a fairly happy user of live-build, but not a contributor
to it. I also don't know anything about live-build-ng yet so it is
perhaps worth mentioning that while I always got the live-build
support I needed, I did always feel that Daniel was perhaps a bit
too brusque with people.
>It is worth noting that live-build is not a Debian project, it is an
>external project that claims to be an official Debian project. This is
>something that needs to be fixed.
This is a pretty big accusation. Considering Debian has Live images
available through its download page (https://www.debi
Hi,
It is worth noting that live-build is not a Debian project, it is an
external project that claims to be an official Debian project. This is
something that needs to be fixed.
There is no namespace issue, we are building on the existing live-config and
live-boot packages that are maintained and
For what its worth I tried to do a clean Jessie-Live install last week and
it didn't install because my PC is UEFI. I then downloaded a regular Debian
Jessie DVD (and even a Wheezy CD) and they both installed on my UEFI
system without any problems. If there are Jessie Live DVDs that will
install o
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Nov 2015 10:40:36 +0100
> Daniel Baumann wrote:
>
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> nice to see you're interested in live-* stuff. however, please
>> consider renaming this package (and also src:live-support), it
>> invades/hijacks the Debian Live
On 11/07/2015 12:33 PM, Neil Williams wrote:
> There is an explicit reason for this. vmdebootstrap is being extended
> explicitly to provide support for a replacement for live-build. This
> work is happening within the debian-cd team to be able to solve the
> existing problems with live-build.
loo
On Sat, 07 Nov 2015 10:40:36 +0100
Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> nice to see you're interested in live-* stuff. however, please
> consider renaming this package (and also src:live-support), it
> invades/hijacks the Debian Live namespace.
There is an explicit reason for this. vmdebootstrap
14 matches
Mail list logo
