>See http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/experimental-live/. These are far too
>experimental currently for public consumption and so not listed on the
>website.
2 things. 1st, it looks like that page popped up yesterday.
2nd, if they are experimental they are absolutely no good in any way shape
or f
Greetings,
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:06 AM, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 08:59:41 +0100
> chals wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Iain R. Learmonth
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Reading what you say, and I beg your pardon before going on, I can
> > tel
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:51:24PM +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Neil Williams wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 11:18:32 +1100
> > "Michael ." wrote:
> >
> >> >There is no namespace issue, we are building on the existing
> >> >live-config
> >> and
> >> >live-boot pack
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 11:18:32 +1100
> "Michael ." wrote:
>
>> >There is no namespace issue, we are building on the existing
>> >live-config
>> and
>> >live-boot packages that are maintained and bringing these into
>> >Debian as native projects
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 12:41:16PM +0200, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Would you (or Steve or the Debian CD team) please point to actual real
> bugs that affected you?
> You claim it as a reason of debian cd team switch to vmdebootsrap. As
> a live-build user, I'm interested by these.
As in my previ
On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:06 AM, Neil Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 08:59:41 +0100
> chals wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Iain R. Learmonth
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > It is worth noting that live-build is not a Debian project, it is an
>> > external project that claims to
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 08:47:53PM +1100, Michael . wrote:
>Yet the Debian CD webpage points directly to Debian Live iso images as
>official images even though you or Iain have said they are not
>official. You haven't found a solution, you haven't even got a Live iso
>image lis
>No, in the Debian project, no team has exclusive rights over package
>namespaces - filename conflicts are different. Namespacing should be
>consistent with the purpose of the package to avoid confusion.
>live-build-ng is the next generation of build tool for live images. The
>name is appropriate.
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 11:18:32 +1100
"Michael ." wrote:
> >There is no namespace issue, we are building on the existing
> >live-config
> and
> >live-boot packages that are maintained and bringing these into
> >Debian as native projects. If necessary, these will be forks, but
> >I'm hoping that won
On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 08:59:41 +0100
chals wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:45 AM, Iain R. Learmonth
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It is worth noting that live-build is not a Debian project, it is an
> > external project that claims to be an official Debian project. This
> > is something that needs to
10 matches
Mail list logo
