On Dec 12, 2014, at 02:10 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
>Name collision is one such problem that can reasonably be foreseen if
>the package name is too generic for its purpose.
Perhaps. It's worth doing a search of existing FLOSS projects and see if
there are existing projects that could reasonably coll
Barry Warsaw writes:
> On Dec 12, 2014, at 08:36 AM, Ben Finney wrote:
>
> >Even for the source package name, “pathlib” is IMO too general.
> >This is specifically a library for Python programmers only; its
> >source package name should not grab a generic name like “pathlib”.
>
> Why not first-co
Benjamin Drung writes:
> The source is called pathlib, but the binary packages are called
> python-pathlib and python-pathlib-doc.
Even for the source package name, =E2=80=9Cpathlib=E2=80=9D is IMO too gene=
ral. This is
specifically a library for Python programmers only; its source package
name
Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2014, 14:35 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
> Hi,
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2014, 17:17 +0100 schrieb Frank Brehm:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Frank Brehm
> >
> > * Package name: pathlib
> > Version : 1.0.1
> > Upstream Author
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 10.12.2014, 17:17 +0100 schrieb Frank Brehm:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Frank Brehm
>
> * Package name: pathlib
> Version : 1.0.1
> Upstream Author : Antoine Pitrou
> * URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pathlib
> * License
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Frank Brehm
* Package name: pathlib
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Antoine Pitrou
* URL : https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pathlib
* License : MIT Licence
Programming Lang: Python
Description : Set of classes to h
6 matches
Mail list logo
