Bug#749456: Package name

2014-06-23 Thread Dima Kogan
Chow Loong Jin writes: > In this case, we're talking about confusion between a package name + /usr/bin > binary and a file format. There isn't, to my knowledge, any other executable > in > PATH by the name of gpx, nor is there a package named gpx, so this is still > rather in the gray area. I'm

Bug#749456: Package name

2014-06-11 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:16:43PM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote: > Chow Loong Jin writes: > > > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 01:48:36PM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote: > >> > >> If it's not too late, would it be possible to change the name of this > >> package? "gpx" is also the name of a common file format used

Bug#749456: Package name

2014-06-10 Thread Dima Kogan
Chow Loong Jin writes: > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 01:48:36PM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote: >> >> If it's not too late, would it be possible to change the name of this >> package? "gpx" is also the name of a common file format used for GPS >> tracks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS_eXchange_Format >>

Bug#749456: Package name

2014-06-10 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 01:48:36PM -0700, Dima Kogan wrote: > Hi. > > If it's not too late, would it be possible to change the name of this > package? "gpx" is also the name of a common file format used for GPS > tracks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS_eXchange_Format > > I think it may be confu

Bug#749456: Package name

2014-06-10 Thread Dima Kogan
Hi. If it's not too late, would it be possible to change the name of this package? "gpx" is also the name of a common file format used for GPS tracks: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPS_eXchange_Format I think it may be confusing to have a "gpx" package that refers to something completely different