Bug#737871: marked as done (O: pristine-tar -- regenerate pristine tarballs)

2016-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 22:33:57 + with message-id and subject line Bug#737871: fixed in pristine-tar 1.34 has caused the Debian Bug report #737871, regarding O: pristine-tar -- regenerate pristine tarballs to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#737871: O: pristine-tar -- regenerate pristine tarballs

2014-03-06 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 19/02/14 01:19, Joey Hess wrote: > You will need to know perl and C. > > dgit does not obsolete dpkg-buildpackage, but dpkg-buildpackage > does not use pristine-tar. > > -- > see shy jo I'll try to fix a bug or two and we'll see. :) Tomasz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@

Bug#737871: O: pristine-tar -- regenerate pristine tarballs

2014-02-18 Thread Joey Hess
You will need to know perl and C. dgit does not obsolete dpkg-buildpackage, but dpkg-buildpackage does not use pristine-tar. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#737871:

2014-02-09 Thread Tomasz Buchert
Hi Joey, I feel like I could maintain pristine-tar. I use git-buildpackage for all my current packages and pristine-tar seems like an important element. I have a few questions that: * I have no experience with Perl - is it going to be an issue? * I didn't know about dgit, does it render

Bug#737871: O: pristine-tar -- regenerate pristine tarballs

2014-02-06 Thread Joey Hess
Package: wnpp Severity: normal I am orphaning pristine-tar. Note that this is a native package, so it needs a new upstream maintainer in addition to Debian maintainer. I have no personal need to use pristine-tar now that dgit exists, and I would rather spend time on dgit. I should add a little b