On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 21:30:05 Boris Pek wrote:
> Producing per plugin binary packages is a bad idea in this case. It
> increases the size of Packages.*, Contents-* and Translation-* files in
> arhive too much, that affects all Debian users, but not only Gajim users.
> Also it increases the size of ar
Hi everyone,
>> 3. I see you've called the source package gajim-plugins. If the idea
>> is to potentially maintain a bunch of non-OTR Gajim plugins in the
>> source package, then I doubt it's appropriate to put it under the
>> OTR team's umbrella. So, perhaps a dedicated source packag
On Fri, 4 Apr 2014 14:23:19 intrigeri wrote:
> I would personally be happy to see you upload the Gajim OTR plugin,
> and become the primary maintainer for it, under our team's umbrella.
I'm not that keen to do that. Not yet. I did packaging over 6 months ago and
it would have been uploaded long t
Hi,
Dmitry Smirnov wrote (03 Apr 2014 20:41:07 GMT) :
> Very nice, thanks. I'd like to let you know about "gajim-plugin-otr" (RFP
> #722130) that I packaged some time ago. It is pretty much ready and only need
> someone to take ownership.
I would personally be happy to see you upload the Gajim
4 matches
Mail list logo
