Bug#721653: License of SSM

2013-09-04 Thread picca
"Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" writes: > Hi, Hello, > > I believe that the license is GPLv3, not LGPL-2.1, see: I asked to the CCP4 peoples and they use LGPL-3, for the opensource libraries. (not all CCP4 software are opensource DFSG-free) It is true that licenses has changed durign the time.

Bug#721653: RE : Bug#721653: License of SSM

2013-09-04 Thread PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> No problem, but note that I'm not reviewing FTP NEW queue or are > related to SSM authors in any way, just happen to see the ITP bug by > chance and decided to send you a note just in case :-) ok, so I contacted the person in charge of CCP4 and here his feedback about ssm license. Hi Fred, t

Bug#721653: License of SSM

2013-09-04 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hi, 2013/9/4 picca : > "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" writes: > >> Hi, > > Hello, > >> >> I believe that the license is GPLv3, not LGPL-2.1, see: > > I asked to the CCP4 peoples and they use LGPL-3, for the opensource > libraries. > (not all CCP4 software are opensource DFSG-free) > It is true t

Bug#721653: License of SSM

2013-09-04 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Hi, I believe that the license is GPLv3, not LGPL-2.1, see: http://www.ccp4.ac.uk/cvs/viewvc.cgi/ssm/COPYING?revision=1.3&view=markup Older revisions of that file shows that it had other awkward licenses in the past, but not LGPL-2.1 (as far as I can see). Cheers. -- Manuel A. Fernandez Monte