Bug#721521: fonts-urw-base35: changing from ITP to RFP

Am Montag, den 08.06.2015, 14:45 +0200 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: > - I am going to wait until this fontconfig version enters Debian and > add a Breaks relation for older fontconfig packages. Note to myself: (<< 2.11.91) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#721521: fonts-urw-base35: changing from ITP to RFP

Am Montag, den 01.12.2014, 17:06 +0100 schrieb Fabian Greffrath: > I am waiting for upstream, i.e. Ghostscript/Artifex, to receive new > versions of the fonts from their respective upstream, i.e. URW, that > have all known issues addressed and feature the extended glyph range > as previous forks o

Bug#721521: fonts-urw-base35: changing from ITP to RFP

retitle 721521 ITP: fonts-urw-base35 -- Set of the 35 PostScript Language Level 2 Base Fonts owner 721521 ! thanks I am waiting for upstream, i.e. Ghostscript/Artifex, to receive new versions of the fonts from their respective upstream, i.e. URW, that have all known issues addressed and feature t

Processed: Re: Bug#721521: fonts-urw-base35: changing from ITP to RFP

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 721521 ITP: fonts-urw-base35 -- Set of the 35 PostScript Language > Level 2 Base Fonts Bug #721521 [wnpp] RFP: fonts-urw-base35 -- Set of the 35 PostScript Language Level 2 Base Fonts Changed Bug title to 'ITP: fonts-urw-base35 -- Set of

Bug#721521: fonts-urw-base35: changing from ITP to RFP

retitle 721521 RFP: fonts-urw-base35 -- Set of the 35 PostScript Language Level 2 Base Fonts noowner 721521 tag 721521 - pending thanks Hi, A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging fonts-urw-base35. Unfortunately, it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bu