retitle 689207 rustc -- a safe, concurrent, practical language
thanks
FYI, rust is in new (but called rustc)
Cheers,
S
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.or
On 16/06/2014 09:54, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> I am working on this itp.
>> Assigning to me to show that it is not stuck.
> OK. May you make your work available somewhere? Maybe in the
> collab-maint repository[1]?
>
> Laszlo/GCS
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 9:39 AM, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> I am working on this itp.
> Assigning to me to show that it is not stuck.
OK. May you make your work available somewhere? Maybe in the
collab-maint repository[1]?
Laszlo/GCS
[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=git/collab-maint/rust.gi
retitle 689207 ITP: rust -- a safe, concurrent, practical language
owner 689207 !
thanks
Hello
I am working on this itp.
Assigning to me to show that it is not stuck.
Sylvestre
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Yes, Luca is touch with ftp master regarding the bootstrap issue, we
> are discussing with upstream on the llvm patches
> and we have the agreement from Mozilla GSoC admin to propose a gsoc on
> the packaging of rust.
I was planning to send a status update as soon as I g
On 13/02/2014 09:08, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any news on rust packaging?
>
> Riku
Yes, Luca is touch with ftp master regarding the bootstrap issue, we are
discussing with upstream on the llvm patches
and we have the agreement from Mozilla GSoC admin to propose a gsoc on
the packaging of rust.
Hi,
Any news on rust packaging?
Riku
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140213080813.ga17...@afflict.kos.to
> This is an automatic email to change the status of rust back from ITP
> (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug
> hasn't seen any activity during the last 10 months.
It's a bit unfortunate that this hijack happened quite quickly, as
background work on rust is ongoing.
retitle 689207 RFP: rust -- a safe, concurrent, practical language
noowner 689207
tag 689207 - pending
thanks
Hi,
A long time ago, you expressed interest in packaging rust. Unfortunately,
it seems that it did not happen. In Debian, we try not to keep ITP bugs open
for a too long time, as it might
9 matches
Mail list logo