Robinson Sathaseevan wrote:
> No worries we all have family and or other commitments so I
> understand. I also noticed the beta release when i got a notification
> about my upstream fork pull request getting merged into main. This may
> drop the need for one of the Debian patches. Because this is
No worries we all have family and or other commitments so I understand. I
also noticed the beta release when i got a notification about my upstream
fork pull request getting merged into main. This may drop the need for one
of the Debian patches. Because this is a simpler python tool and upstream
is
Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
> Robinson Sathaseevan wrote:
>
>> Hi Jay,
>>
>> I have an upload of the latest version over at mentors. That's because
>> I don't have permission to commit to the svn repository for debian/*
>> as a new maintainer.
>> See: http://mentors.debian.net/package/s3cmd
>>
>> Ther
Robinson Sathaseevan wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> I have an upload of the latest version over at mentors. That's because
> I don't have permission to commit to the svn repository for debian/*
> as a new maintainer.
> See: http://mentors.debian.net/package/s3cmd
>
> There's an RFS bug open as well:
> http
Hi Jay,
I have an upload of the latest version over at mentors. That's because
I don't have permission to commit to the svn repository for debian/*
as a new maintainer.
See: http://mentors.debian.net/package/s3cmd
There's an RFS bug open as well:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=7
Is there any activity on adoption of s3cmd? I am also willing to adopt
it. I use s3cmd both at home and at work, so while my debian time is
pretty limited overall, I could justify using some work time to help
maintain this. I'm already a full debian developer and I already have
another package t
6 matches
Mail list logo
