Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package wnpp
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'wnpp'
Limit currently set to 'package':'wnpp'
> retitle 653113 RFP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool
Bug #65
package wnpp
retitle 653113 RFP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool
noowner 653113
thanks
On 15-Jul-2013, micah wrote:
> I haven't seen an update on this ITP since 30 Aug 2012, and the mentors
> bug was closed after no response (#669720).
Given no response since 2012, I am reverting this
Hello,
I haven't seen an update on this ITP since 30 Aug 2012, and the mentors
bug was closed after no response (#669720).
It would be really great if this work wasn't lost, it seemed very close
to being finished. Maybe now things are in a better state?
micah
pgpQd1l4by5Gs.pgp
Description: P
Any update on the progress of packaging ReviewBoard?!
--
Per
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/cabyrxsswsphwfjoisd_w65z4ahi061wppnws74myg-v1oyn...@mail
Hi Dmitry,
On Mittwoch, 29. August 2012, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
> Sorry for very slow response. Currently I'm mostly busy with some other
> things.. I'll return to this in a few weeks.
[...]
> That's why my current plan is to package ReviewBoard to experimental only
> with some notes about these
On 30-Aug-2012, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
> As about original question, we've a few important issues here:
[…]
> That's why my current plan is to package ReviewBoard to experimental only
> with some notes about these issues
Thank you for the update. I look forward to more news about this package's
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 10:36:00AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Samstag, 25. August 2012, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Holger, thank you for offering to sponsor these packages. Have you made
> > progress on helping Dmitry get this into Debian?
>
> it's stalled at the "python-django-pipel
Hi Ben,
On Samstag, 25. August 2012, Ben Finney wrote:
> Holger, thank you for offering to sponsor these packages. Have you made
> progress on helping Dmitry get this into Debian?
it's stalled at the "python-django-pipeline vs python-pipeline" issue,
installing the former breaks the later, there
On 22-Apr-2012, Holger Levsen wrote:
> very cool! I'll see that I'll have a look in the next 2 weeks but wouldnt
> mind if someone does it earlier! dget'ing the files at least now, so I
> can look at them when I'm bored offline :)
On 03-May-2012, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
> Just a reminder. I'm sti
Just a reminder. I'm still looking for sponsor for these reviewboard
related packages. There is just one issue left (with conflicting
python-django-pipeline vs python-pipeline).
I'm not sure how to solve it. Author of python-pipeline (that is already
in debian) stated that he is going to rename hi
Hi Dmitry,
On Samstag, 21. April 2012, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
> I've uploaded reviewboard to mentors.debian.net and looking for sponsor:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=669720
very cool! I'll see that I'll have a look in the next 2 weeks but wouldnt mind
if someone doe
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 01:46:20PM +0300, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
> I'm still working on it. Followed dependencies are packaged and are
> waiting for sponsor:
Hi,
I've uploaded reviewboard to mentors.debian.net and looking for sponsor:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=66
block 653113 by 669426
block 653113 by 656275
stop
I'm still working on it. Followed dependencies are packaged and are
waiting for sponsor:
- python-django-djblets
- python-django-evolution
ReviewBoard itself is almost ready with some minor issues
--
WBR, Dmitry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
On Mittwoch, 18. April 2012, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
> I'm sorry, but unfortunately I was busy with other things. I've some
> initial stuff. And since there is some demand on reviewboard in debian,
> I'll try to make something to show this weekend.
ok, cool!
> It's will be cool if you'll r
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 07:21:42PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> whats the status of your reviewboard ITP? The last reply on the bug is from
> January
>
> I'm a DD and could help with reviewing or sponsoring! :)
Hi,
I'm sorry, but unfortunately I was busy with other things.
Hi Dmitry,
whats the status of your reviewboard ITP? The last reply on the bug is from
January
I'm a DD and could help with reviewing or sponsoring! :)
cheers,
Holger
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Cont
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:49:58AM +1100, Ben Finney wrote:
> Thank you, Dmitry.
I'm not DD, so it'll take even more time =)
>
> > Please note that at least a few dependencies of current version of
> > reviewboard are not packaged for debian, so it'll take more time
>
> Understood. What are the
On 18-Jan-2012, Dmitry Nezhevenko wrote:
> I'm using it now at work, so I'm going to package it soon.
Thank you, Dmitry.
> Please note that at least a few dependencies of current version of
> reviewboard are not packaged for debian, so it'll take more time
Understood. What are the particular dep
retitle 653113 ITP: reviewboard -- web-based code review tool
owner 653113 !
stop
I'm using it now at work, so I'm going to package it soon.
Please note that at least a few dependencies of current version of
reviewboard are not packaged for debian, so it'll take more time
--
WBR, Dmitry
--
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: review-board
Version : 1.6.3
Upstream Author : Beanbag, Inc.
* URL or Web page : http://www.reviewboard.org/
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: Python
Description : web-based code review tool
Review Board offers
20 matches
Mail list logo
