Bug#650394: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#650394: updated packages available

2014-09-05 Thread Mike Gabriel
Hi Yaroslav, On Do 04 Sep 2014 15:28:40 CEST, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: and just to keep things moving: - thanks to Julien Cristau we now have xorg configure params exported so we can use them (I only disabled xwayland extension) - I have rewritten pristine-tar commits for 1.3.1 (remove

Bug#650394: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#650394: updated packages available

2014-09-04 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Thu, 04 Sep 2014, Pierre Ossman wrote: > > >(2) Have all of Pierre's Fltk patches been incorporated into the native > > >debian Fltk package?   > > hm, personally -- don't know. looking at the packaging 1.3.2-6 we have > > doesn't seems to carry this one, http://www.fltk.org/str.php

Bug#650394: updated packages available

2014-09-04 Thread Pierre Ossman
On Thu, 7 Aug 2014 10:57:57 -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > >(2) Have all of Pierre's Fltk patches been incorporated into the native > >debian Fltk package?   > > hm, personally -- don't know. looking at the packaging 1.3.2-6 we have > doesn't seems to carry this one, http://www.fl

Bug#650394: updated packages available

2014-08-07 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 06.08.2014 um 16:50 schrieb Yaroslav Halchenko: > > On Wed, 06 Aug 2014, Matthias Klose wrote: > ha -- great -- thanks for the update, I only wished that the > debian/changelog entry was a bit more descriptive ;) > > - I guess since packaging now doesn't carry a copy of xorg sources, > the

Bug#650394: updated packages available

2014-08-07 Thread Matthias Klose
Am 07.08.2014 um 14:19 schrieb Brian Hinz: > (2) Have all of Pierre's Fltk patches been incorporated into the native > debian Fltk package? If not, the viewer will lack full functionality. (I > realize that statically linking the fltk libs into our binary is > problematic from a distro point of v

Bug#650394: updated packages available

2014-08-07 Thread Brian Hinz
On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > >I have some questions about your package: > >(1) Where is the java viewer? Being as it's my primary contribution > to > >the project, I'd kinda like to see it included ;) > > I guess we have not packaged that one yet :-/

Bug#650394: updated packages available

2014-08-07 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Thu, 07 Aug 2014, Brian Hinz wrote: >On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko ><[1]deb...@onerussian.com> wrote: > - I see that there is some packaging available in upstream sources now, >   done by Brian (CCed).  Brian -- would you be interested to join our >

Bug#650394: updated packages available

2014-08-07 Thread Brian Hinz
On Wed, Aug 6, 2014 at 10:50 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > > - I see that there is some packaging available in upstream sources now, > done by Brian (CCed). Brian -- would you be interested to join our > tigervnc Debian packaging team to not duplicate efforts and avoid > proliferation o

Bug#650394: [Pkg-tigervnc-devel] Bug#650394: updated packages available

2014-08-06 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
would you also mind to clarify the origin of patches under debian/patchdir/f/ ? for now I have pushed all that stuff (with just changelog and gbp.conf adjusted and watch file added) into our GIT. On Wed, 06 Aug 2014, Matthias Klose wrote: > now the package has an ITP again, without many action.

Bug#650394: updated packages available

2014-08-06 Thread Yaroslav Halchenko
On Wed, 06 Aug 2014, Matthias Klose wrote: > now the package has an ITP again, without many action. I did update the > packaging, and built it here: > https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain/+sourcepub/4325100/+listing-archive-extra > "final" package currently in > https://launchpa

Bug#650394: updated packages available

2014-08-06 Thread Matthias Klose
now the package has an ITP again, without many action. I did update the packaging, and built it here: https://launchpad.net/~doko/+archive/ubuntu/toolchain/+sourcepub/4325100/+listing-archive-extra "final" package currently in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/utopic/+queue?queue_state=0 if accepted,