Your message dated Fri, 31 May 2013 10:02:25 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#612341: fixed in libjpeg-turbo 1.2.90-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #612341,
regarding ITP: libjpeg-turbo -- an accelerated libjpeg library
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi Yaroslav,
On Fr 22 Mär 2013 17:21:24 CET Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Yaroslav, hi all,
On Mi 20 Mär 2013 20:26:24 CET Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
[...]
I have worked-in (hopefully!) all comments/requests dicussed during
the last days into libjpeg-turbo.git on collab-maint.
I have also att
Am 22.03.2013 10:22, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On Fr 22 Mär 2013 18:19:14 CET Matthias Klose wrote:
>
>> Am 22.03.2013 09:21, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
>>> Hi Yaroslav, hi all,
>>>
>>> On Mi 20 Mär 2013 20:26:24 CET Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>>>
[...]
>>>
>>> I have worked-in (
Hi Matthias,
On Fr 22 Mär 2013 18:19:14 CET Matthias Klose wrote:
Am 22.03.2013 09:21, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
Hi Yaroslav, hi all,
On Mi 20 Mär 2013 20:26:24 CET Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
[...]
I have worked-in (hopefully!) all comments/requests dicussed during the
last days into libjpeg-t
Am 22.03.2013 09:21, schrieb Mike Gabriel:
> Hi Yaroslav, hi all,
>
> On Mi 20 Mär 2013 20:26:24 CET Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
>> [...]
>
> I have worked-in (hopefully!) all comments/requests dicussed during the
> last days into libjpeg-turbo.git on collab-maint.
>
> I have also attempted to
kage-name-doesnt-match-sonames libjpeg8
+# upstream (DRC ) states that the below issue
+# can be ignored, see:
+# http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612341#255
+libjpeg8-turbo: shlib-calls-exit usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjpeg.so.8.0.2
diff --git a/debian/libturbojpeg1.lintian-overrides b/
Hi Yaroslav,
On Mi 20 Mär 2013 20:26:24 CET Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Yaroslav,
On Fr 01 Mär 2013 16:11:10 CET Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>Hi Guys,
>I wonder if anyone could give a concise summary stopping libjpeg-turbo
>from being uploaded
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Yaroslav,
> On Fr 01 Mär 2013 16:11:10 CET Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> >Hi Guys,
> >I wonder if anyone could give a concise summary stopping libjpeg-turbo
> >from being uploaded? there seemed to be lots of work, clarifications
> >from upstream, do
So officially speaking :-)
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 10:59 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Tom Gall wrote:
>
>> > then Matthias Klose also contributed (no changes in
>> > debian/copyright were done though)
>> > and then there was
>> > + * Drop outdated copyright noti
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, DRC wrote:
> exit() is called by error_exit() in jerror.c, which is part of the
> libjpeg source. error_exit() is part of the standard error manager
> for libjpeg. Applications do not have to use that error manager.
> The TurboJPEG wrapper, specifically, uses its own custom
Hi Bill,
Thanks for the quick reply:
> The rationale for this lintian test is ridiculous.
why? to me it sounds like a sensible test.
> If you look at the code of libjpeg, you will a single instance of call to exit
> with a large comment explaining how the user can override it.
> I a msure yo
exit() is called by error_exit() in jerror.c, which is part of the
libjpeg source. error_exit() is part of the standard error manager for
libjpeg. Applications do not have to use that error manager. The
TurboJPEG wrapper, specifically, uses its own custom error manager that
will catch errors
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:09:03PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Dear maintainers,
>
> In the course of packaging of turbojpeg library we ran into a lintian
> warning on shlib-calls-exit in the dynamic libraries. This is not
> specific to turbojpeg and I guess is a legacy of libjpeg and many
Am 20.03.2013 08:59, schrieb Yaroslav Halchenko:
>
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Tom Gall wrote:
>
>>> then Matthias Klose also contributed (no changes in
>>> debian/copyright were done though)
>>> and then there was
>>> + * Drop outdated copyright notice for /debian folder and replace by
>>> +
Dear maintainers,
In the course of packaging of turbojpeg library we ran into a lintian
warning on shlib-calls-exit in the dynamic libraries. This is not
specific to turbojpeg and I guess is a legacy of libjpeg and many other
libraries: http://lintian.debian.org/tags/shlib-calls-exit.html
where c
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Tom Gall wrote:
> > then Matthias Klose also contributed (no changes in
> > debian/copyright were done though)
> > and then there was
> > + * Drop outdated copyright notice for /debian folder and replace by
> > +GPL-2+ copyright entry in /debian/copyright.
> Hm.
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> Hi Mike et al.,
>
> On Sat, 16 Mar 2013, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>> >I wonder if anyone could give a concise summary stopping libjpeg-turbo
>> >from being uploaded? there seemed to be lots of work, clarifications
>> >from upstream, dow
Hi Yaroslav,
On Mi 20 Mär 2013 15:59:32 CET Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Hi Mike et al.,
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>I wonder if anyone could give a concise summary stopping libjpeg-turbo
>from being uploaded? there seemed to be lots of work, clarifications
>from upstream, downstr
Hi Mike et al.,
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> >I wonder if anyone could give a concise summary stopping libjpeg-turbo
> >from being uploaded? there seemed to be lots of work, clarifications
> >from upstream, downstream distributions including it,... and no
> >clarity why we do not ha
Hi Yaroslav,
On Fr 01 Mär 2013 16:11:10 CET Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Hi Guys,
I wonder if anyone could give a concise summary stopping libjpeg-turbo
from being uploaded? there seemed to be lots of work, clarifications
from upstream, downstream distributions including it,... and no
clarity wh
retitle #612341 ITP: libjpeg-turbo -- an accelerated libjpeg library
owner #612341
thanks
Dear all,
The pkg-tigervnc team will take over this task of packaging
libjpeg-turbo. I am aware of the earlier discussions about libjpeg vs.
libjpeg-turbo.
PLEASE NOTE: We will _NOT_ replace libjpeg i
Hi Guys,
I wonder if anyone could give a concise summary stopping libjpeg-turbo
from being uploaded? there seemed to be lots of work, clarifications
from upstream, downstream distributions including it,... and no
clarity why we do not have it in Debian yet (could simply be a lack of
time?).
Than
Hi there. I am just now coming across this thread and thought I should
interject my take on the situation. I am not, under any circumstances,
intending to start or continue a holy war, and this will be the last
thing I have to say on the matter unless someone has a specific question
for me, b
I'm going to poke this mess of a bug report.
Let's do something about this.
Cheers,
Paul
--
.''`. Paul Tagliamonte
: :' : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
`- http://people.debian.org/~paultag
signature.asc
Description: Digita
Hi,
(I had email problem resending ...)
On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 08:18:14AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it seems the discussion has come to an intermediary still point... I
> will pick up the thread then...
>
> On So 03 Jun 2012 11:32:47 CEST Bill Allombert wrote:
>
> >>Not get
Hi all,
On Sa 02 Jun 2012 20:53:10 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > We would have to import latest upstream on top of that
>
> Well, unless we all agree to reset git repo, this is impossible to do. I
> like to do it
+1 from me. However, as Fathi is ITP holder, he may have the last word.
I know
Hi all,
it seems the discussion has come to an intermediary still point... I
will pick up the thread then...
On So 03 Jun 2012 11:32:47 CEST Bill Allombert wrote:
Not getting what you mean exactly here. Can anything be done about
it? Anything that we can do?
I assume that Osamu refer to t
On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 10:51:13AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Osamu, hi all,
>
> On Sa 02 Jun 2012 20:53:10 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 06:58:51AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> >>Hi Osamu,
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:50:19PM +0200,
Hi Osamu, hi all,
On Sa 02 Jun 2012 20:53:10 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 06:58:51AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Osamu,
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> ...
> > you may want to have a very little bit more history... (and a
> >
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 06:58:51AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Osamu,
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > ...
> > > you may want to have a very little bit more history... (and a
> > > packaging folder)
> > > http://code.x2go.org/gitweb?p=li
Hi Osamu,
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> ...
> > you may want to have a very little bit more history... (and a
> > packaging folder)
> > http://code.x2go.org/gitweb?p=libjpeg-turbo.git;a=summary
>
> This is one of them. Ubuntu package history is anoth
Hi all,
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:57:54PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > ...
> > > you may want to have a very little bit more history... (and a
> > > packaging folder)
> > > http://code.x2go.org/gitweb?p=libjpeg-turbo
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:57:54PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> ...
> > you may want to have a very little bit more history... (and a
> > packaging folder)
> > http://code.x2go.org/gitweb?p=libjpeg-turbo.git;a=summary
>
> This
Hi,
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 11:50:19PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
...
> you may want to have a very little bit more history... (and a
> packaging folder)
> http://code.x2go.org/gitweb?p=libjpeg-turbo.git;a=summary
This is one of them. Ubuntu package history is another one.
> We would have to
Hi,
On Do 31 Mai 2012 15:55:28 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 07:36:12PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> >Also, Mike Gabriel's work seems to have done somethings interesting on
>> >old Fathi's version and made many improvem
Hi,
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 07:36:12PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >> >Also, Mike Gabriel's work seems to have done somethings interesting on
> >> >old Fathi's version and made many improvements.
> >>
> >> thanks for pinging us! I agree, libjp
just a note for the packaging as done in Ubuntu during the precise release
cycle. goals were
- be able to revert the change and use libjpeg8 again if needed,
so I did use different binary package names for the libjpeg-turbo
sources.
- identify packages which do use symbols found in -turbo
Hi,
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:20:21PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mi 30 Mai 2012 11:21:18 CEST Bill Allombert wrote:
...
Let's focus on topic: ITP = Intent_To_Package for libjpeg-turbo
> >Whether a package is correctly licensed is certainly relevant to an ITP.
> >libjpeg-turbo is
Hi,
On Mi 30 Mai 2012 11:21:18 CEST Bill Allombert wrote:
I fully agree with Fathi, no political discussion via an Debian ITP in BTS.
Guido and me have been dragged in this bug log against our will. You
can hardly
blame us for answering.
Not blaming anyone...
Whether a package is corre
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:09:12AM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Fathi,
>
> On Mi 30 Mai 2012 06:06:07 CEST Fathi Boudra wrote:
>
> >On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Guido Vollbeding wrote:
> >>Hello Mathieu
> >>
> >>Thank you for question.
> >>libjpeg is reference code, not faulty patchwork.
Hello Mathieu
I fully agree with Fathi, no political discussion via an Debian ITP in BTS.
Well the issues were about:
1. legal issues
2. ABI compatibility
You are right, these are more substantial than just "political" issues.
(1) If any part of the source code for this software is distrib
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 06:58:40AM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Bill Allombert
> wrote:
> > I am surprised you do not count Debian as a major distro.
> > Does libjpeg-progs works correctly with LJT ?
>
> That's my point. Debian is the only one that haven't switch
just a note for the packaging as done in Ubuntu during the precise release
cycle. goals were
- be able to revert the change and use libjpeg8 again if needed,
so I did use different binary package names for the libjpeg-turbo
sources.
- identify packages which do use symbols found in -turbo
Hi all,
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Mike Gabriel
wrote:
> Hi Fathi,
>
>
> On Mi 30 Mai 2012 06:06:07 CEST Fathi Boudra wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Guido Vollbeding
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Mathieu
>>>
>>> Thank you for question.
>>> libjpeg is reference code, not faulty pat
Hi Fathi,
On Mi 30 Mai 2012 06:06:07 CEST Fathi Boudra wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Guido Vollbeding wrote:
Hello Mathieu
Thank you for question.
libjpeg is reference code, not faulty patchwork.
Everything is said in the README:
There are currently distributions in circulation c
For information, it looks like not all of libjpeg8 is actually
implemented in libjpeg-turbo, ref:
http://libjpeg-turbo.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/libjpeg-turbo/trunk/README-turbo.txt
In particular:
libjpeg v7 and v8 Features:
---
Fully supported:
-- cjpeg: Separate quali
Dear Fathi Boudra
What they agree or not agree is not relevant, but the facts are relevant!
To give you a few real examples:
You won't be able to access the following image with your browsers,
because they use obsolete and illegal derivations of libjpeg:
http://filmicgames.com/Images/Patents
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:15 AM, Guido Vollbeding wrote:
> Hello Mathieu
>
> Thank you for question.
> libjpeg is reference code, not faulty patchwork.
> Everything is said in the README:
>
> There are currently distributions in circulation containing the name
> "libjpeg" which claim to be a "de
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Bill Allombert
wrote:
> I am surprised you do not count Debian as a major distro.
> Does libjpeg-progs works correctly with LJT ?
That's my point. Debian is the only one that haven't switched yet :)
Yes, LJT works with libjpeg-progs.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hello Mathieu
Thank you for question.
libjpeg is reference code, not faulty patchwork.
Everything is said in the README:
There are currently distributions in circulation containing the name
"libjpeg" which claim to be a "derivative" or "fork" of the original
libjpeg, but don't have the fea
Guido,
Sorry to make you jump in the middle of this thread. We are
discussing compatibilities issues in between LJT (lib JPEG Turbo) and
the official IJG distribution. The whole thread can be seen here:
http://bugs.debian.org/612341
Do you have any particular comments on LJT ? From a pure de
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 07:27:35PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Hi Bill,
>
> On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Does libjpeg-turbo8 implement the full v8 API ? As far as I understand some
> > functions
> > are stub.
>
> I'm not sure it's relevant anymore. All major distro
Hi Fathi,
On Di 29 Mai 2012 18:36:12 CEST Fathi Boudra wrote:
Sounds like many people are interested. LJT is a good candidate for
collab-maint on git.debian.org :)
Good idea. Please relocate the packaging Git so that we can work
together on this.
Greets,
Mike
--
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike g
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> >Also, Mike Gabriel's work seems to have done somethings interesting on
>> >old Fathi's version and made many improvements.
>>
>> thanks for pinging us! I agree, libjpeg-turbo has to be in Wheezy!!!
>>
>> Fathi, please send us a notice what you
Hi Bill,
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Does libjpeg-turbo8 implement the full v8 API ? As far as I understand some
> functions
> are stub.
I'm not sure it's relevant anymore. All major distro have switched to LJT.
Ubuntu is using it by default and no issues were found
Hi,
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 10:43:39AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi there,
...
> > CCed: Bill who is libjpeg maintainer.
>
> As far as I know libjpeg is not really concerned here. virtualgl only
> links to libturbojpeg. So there really are two issues in a single
> report:
> 1. optimized j
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 03:34:39AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:31:46PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Sa 26 Mai 2012 17:11:02 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >
> > >This ITP Bug #612341 was supposed to be c
Hi there,
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 8:34 PM, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:31:46PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> On Sa 26 Mai 2012 17:11:02 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
>>
>> >This ITP Bug #612341 was supposed to be
Hi,
On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 06:31:46PM +0200, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Sa 26 Mai 2012 17:11:02 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
>
> >This ITP Bug #612341 was supposed to be closed by Fathi sometime early
> >January. Nothing happened. http://bugs.debian.org/61234
This is FYI:
Migrating from Ubuntu to Debian require us to make trivial updates on
changelog and control.
Here is updated debian/patches file with unfuzzy and manual merging.
This builds OK.
Osamu
--- /dev/null
+++ b/COPYING
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+This LGPL License ONLY applies to the contents of t
Hi all,
On Sa 26 Mai 2012 17:11:02 CEST Osamu Aoki wrote:
This ITP Bug #612341 was supposed to be closed by Fathi sometime early
January. Nothing happened. http://bugs.debian.org/612341
In the meantime, Ubuntu package was updated to generate -dev etc.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
Hi,
This ITP Bug #612341 was supposed to be closed by Fathi sometime early
January. Nothing happened. http://bugs.debian.org/612341
In the meantime, Ubuntu package was updated to generate -dev etc.
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libjpeg-turbo
libjpeg-turbo (1.1.90+svn733-0ubuntu4
It would be super nice of there was also a libjpeg-turbo-dev package
which would provide turbojpeg.h. This file is exepcted for some other
software, including virtuagl:
-- Found OpenGL: /usr/lib/libGL.so
-- Enabling X Video support
CMake Error at cmakescripts/FindTurboJPEG.cmake:23 (message):
C
Any update on this ITP ?
I am trying to get it to build/install on my debian stable but it fails with:
$ sudo dpkg -i ../libjpeg-turbo8_1.1.90+svn704-1+x2go1_amd64.deb
Selecting previously deselected package libjpeg-turbo8.
(Reading database ... 231169 files and directories currently installed.)
Hi Fathi,
under this link you find a libjpeg-turbo Git that provides packages
with libjpeg8 API mode being enabled:
http://code.x2go.org/gitweb?p=libjpeg-turbo.git;a=summary
Feel free to cherry-pick & rebase from there...
Mike
--
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, dorfstr. 27, 24245 barmissen
Hi Fathi,
On Fr 06 Jan 2012 22:55:10 CET Fathi Boudra wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Hi Fabo,
can you say anything about the status of the libjpeg-turbo ITP? I have just
placed an ITP for TigerVNC, but TigerVNC needs libjpeg-turbo.
Thanks for any information
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Hi Fabo,
>
> can you say anything about the status of the libjpeg-turbo ITP? I have just
> placed an ITP for TigerVNC, but TigerVNC needs libjpeg-turbo.
>
> Thanks for any information being given.
It's ready to be uploaded. I need to enab
Hi Fabo,
can you say anything about the status of the libjpeg-turbo ITP? I have
just placed an ITP for TigerVNC, but TigerVNC needs libjpeg-turbo.
Thanks for any information being given.
Mike
--
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, dorfstr. 27, 24245 barmissen
fon: +49 (4302) 281418, fax: +49 (43
Initial package available on:
http://people.debian.org/~fabo/libjpeg-turbo_1.1.90+svn704-1/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CANZTuJrjOAKgAKDmEJN=2a8AT
Hello.
Please see #602034.
Its not that simple, probably a switch could be done if/when
libjpeg-turbo implements the features and ABI of version 8.
Thanks!!!
--
Ivan Baldo - iba...@adinet.com.uy - http://ibaldo.codigolibre.net/
From Montevideo, Uruguay, at the south of South Ame
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: libjpeg-turbo
Version : 1.0.90
Upstream Author : Name
* URL : http://libjpeg-turbo.virtualgl.org/
* License : wxWindows Library License 3.1/LGPL/BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : an accelerated altern
71 matches
Mail list logo
