Bug#595202: felix_1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2010-09-05 Thread Torsten Werner
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Georges Khaznadar wrote: > So I'll do it, open a new ITP, an merge 595202 with it. retitle would do it > The scans weigh about 170 MB, and they are the meat of the program. > Without them the program would just be able to say which page of the > dictionary contain

Bug#595202: felix_1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2010-09-05 Thread Georges Khaznadar
Torsten Werner a écrit : > > The scans weigh about 170 MB, and they are the meat of the program. > > Without them the program would just be able to say which page of the > > dictionary contains some word, without displaying the page. > > That sounds like they should be included in the main package

Bug#595202: felix_1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2010-09-05 Thread Georges Khaznadar
Torsten Werner a écrit : > > ... for example renaming it felix-latin > > That sounds like a good idea. So I'll do it, open a new ITP, an merge 595202 with it. > > Another issue was pointed by Fabian Greffrath. The package (to be > > renamed felix-latin) contains a big part which is just a set of

Bug#595202: felix_1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2010-09-05 Thread Georges Khaznadar
Hello Torsten, I would like to fix two issues before uploading felix (Latin-French dictionary) again. First, I suppose that somebody intended to package the Felix language referred by http://sourceforge.net/projects/felix/, so a namespace collision may occur. As Latin-French dictionaries may be l

Bug#595202: felix_1.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2010-09-05 Thread Torsten Werner
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Georges Khaznadar wrote: > First, I suppose that somebody intended to package the Felix language > referred by http://sourceforge.net/projects/felix/, so a namespace > collision may occur. As Latin-French dictionaries may be less popular > than computer languages in