Bug#584769: RFS: clustershell

2010-06-08 Thread Stéphan Gorget
On 07/06/2010 13:42, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > On 07/06/10 at 13:13 +0200, Stéphan Gorget wrote: >> On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Lucas Nussbaum >> wrote: >> >>> (Please Cc me on replies, I don't follow -mentors@ very closely). >>> >>> First question: why do we need yet another parallel command e

Bug#584769: RFS: clustershell

2010-06-07 Thread Stéphan Gorget
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > (Please Cc me on replies, I don't follow -mentors@ very closely). > > First question: why do we need yet another parallel command execution > tool? Why is it better than pdsh, dsh, dish, fabric, capistrano, > taktuk+kanif, etc? I'm not argui

Bug#584769: RFS: clustershell

2010-06-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 07/06/10 at 13:13 +0200, Stéphan Gorget wrote: > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 11:09 AM, Lucas Nussbaum > wrote: > > > (Please Cc me on replies, I don't follow -mentors@ very closely). > > > > First question: why do we need yet another parallel command execution > > tool? Why is it better than pdsh,

Bug#584769: RFS: clustershell

2010-06-07 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
(Please Cc me on replies, I don't follow -mentors@ very closely). First question: why do we need yet another parallel command execution tool? Why is it better than pdsh, dsh, dish, fabric, capistrano, taktuk+kanif, etc? I'm not arguing that it is not better, but we have so many of those that it wo