I forgot the patch. Attached this time.
I've also filed this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/1000527
which points out breakage in the package due
to trying to deal with syslinx version changes but assumes Ubuntu
nomenclature in a version check.
diff -urN usb-creator
I just came across this package due to debian-CD discussion on d-devel.
I fixed up the current ubuntu version so it builds and installs on
Debian and is less distro-specific.
Then I found this ITP and argument about the name.
Where are we at? Is anyone going to get this into wheezy (I think it
Hey Sam,
> If there hasn't been any progress on this I would be extremely
> interested in taking over this.
I have many things on my hands right now and therefor feel free to
take over this package.
Enjoy,
Adnan
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 6:38 PM, Sam Dunne wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> If there hasn'
Hey there,
If there hasn't been any progress on this I would be extremely
interested in taking over this.
Let me know :)
--
Sam Dunne
BSc Computer Science, UCD Dublin.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas.
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> noowner 576359
Bug #576359 [wnpp] ITP: usb-creator -- startup disk creator
Bug #582884 [wnpp] ITP: usb-creator -- startup disk creator
Ignoring request to unset the owner of bug #576359 which was not set
Ignoring request to unset the owner of
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 22:32, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
> Hey,
>
> As I don't see any progress on this ITP/RFS I would like to take over
> and try to get it into Debian.
Hi Adnan,
As the previous ITPer, I was intending to switch this ITP to RFP. I
have done some work on it, but I'm not sure if it wil
Hey guys, not that wheezy is open, is there any chance of getting this
going again? If I can do anything to help, please give me a poke!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http:/
On 4 September 2010 15:21, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:09, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Am 03.06.2010 13:22, schrieb Evan Dandrea:
>>
Am 27.05.2010 13:47, schrieb Evan Dandrea:
> I can't say I agree, but if we're going to have to do this, we mig
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:09, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Am 03.06.2010 13:22, schrieb Evan Dandrea:
>
>>> Am 27.05.2010 13:47, schrieb Evan Dandrea:
I can't say I agree, but if we're going to have to do this, we might
as well take the opportunity to make it consistent wit
The Debian Live team appreciates that you don't use '^live' prefix for
packages that are not maintained by the Debian Live team. This avoids
much confusion and makes our life of supporting users easier.
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:
Hi!
Am 03.06.2010 13:22, schrieb Evan Dandrea:
>> Am 27.05.2010 13:47, schrieb Evan Dandrea:
>>> I can't say I agree, but if we're going to have to do this, we might
>>> as well take the opportunity to make it consistent with the .desktop
>>> file. Alexander, are you okay with startup-disk-creat
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
wrote:
> Am 27.05.2010 13:47, schrieb Evan Dandrea:
>> I can't say I agree, but if we're going to have to do this, we might
>> as well take the opportunity to make it consistent with the .desktop
>> file. Alexander, are you okay with start
Hi!
Am 27.05.2010 13:47, schrieb Evan Dandrea:
> I can't say I agree, but if we're going to have to do this, we might
> as well take the opportunity to make it consistent with the .desktop
> file. Alexander, are you okay with startup-disk-creator?
Yes, that sounds good to me.
Best regards,
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:46, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
wrote:
> Hi!
Hello Alexander,
Thank you for taking the time to look at this thread.
> To answer your questions:
>
> Yes, the name is too generic.
> No, "it is already in Ubuntu" is no argument.
> No, "it will lead to some kind of problems
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:30 PM, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:46, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
> wrote:
>> Yes, the name is too generic.
>> No, "it is already in Ubuntu" is no argument.
>> No, "it will lead to some kind of problems for Ubuntu to have it in
>> Debian with a d
Hi!
* Ignace Mouzannar [100527 00:53]:
> > Besides, FTP-masters could not like that name because it's too generic
> Let's let FTP-masters talk for themselves, before shouting out-loud
> what they could or could not like.
[.]
> > So, before proceeding with the upload, you may want to check with t
On 05/27/2010 12:53 AM, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
>>
>> Besides, FTP-masters could not like that name because it's too generic
>
> Let's let FTP-masters talk for themselves, before shouting out-loud
> what they could or could not like.
>
I'm not "shouting out-loud"! I'm giving you an advice/inform
On 26 May 2010 23:50, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:10, Evan Dandrea wrote:
>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Ignace Mouzannar
>> wrote:
>>> Excellent job. Howerver, it seems that the version 0.2.23 has not been
>>> released by upstream yet. I prefer waiting for the ne
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 23:55, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 05/24/2010 06:19 PM, Justin B Rye wrote:
>>
>> Taking that already confusing term and leaving off the "live"
>> eliminates the only clue that it has something to do with booting an
>> operating system, and leaves us wondering how you've manag
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:10, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Ignace Mouzannar
> wrote:
>> Excellent job. Howerver, it seems that the version 0.2.23 has not been
>> released by upstream yet. I prefer waiting for the new release before
>> trying to upload it to Debian.
>
On 05/24/2010 06:19 PM, Justin B Rye wrote:
>
> Taking that already confusing term and leaving off the "live"
> eliminates the only clue that it has something to do with booting an
> operating system, and leaves us wondering how you've managed to
> package a Creator that can be plugged into a USB
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
> Excellent job. Howerver, it seems that the version 0.2.23 has not been
> released by upstream yet. I prefer waiting for the new release before
> trying to upload it to Debian.
This is a native package. 0.2.23 will be released when it's
Hello Dmitrijs,
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 14:24, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> Here is the current dsc ready for upload to Debian (with last minute
> fixes to debrand package description)
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/usb-creator/usb-creator_0.2.23.dsc
>
> also pushed as a branch lp:
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 14:02, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> On 24 May 2010 12:53, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dmitrijs,
>>
>> I already own an ITP for usb-creator [1].
>>
>
> reportbug failed to bring it up =( annoyed. Sorry about this.
>
>> I have started working on it. I should be releasing i
Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> * Package name : usb-creator
"usb-creator" is a bit misleading (or at least… not clear). Could
you rename it into something like "live-usb-creator"?
>>>
>>> This package has been shipped in Ubuntu for a few releases now.
>>
>> Honest
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
* Package name : usb-creator
>>>
>>> "usb-creator" is a bit misleading (or at least… not clear). Could
>>> you rename it into something like "live-usb-creator"?
>> This package has been shipped in Ubuntu for a few releases now.
>
> Hone
On 05/24/2010 03:19 PM, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Mehdi Dogguy
> wrote:
> * Package name: usb-creator
"usb-creator" is a bit misleading (or at least… not clear).
Could you rename it into something like "live-usb-creator"?
>>> This package has
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 12:55, Dmitrijs Ledkovs
wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,
> usb-creator-hack...@lists.launchpad.net,
> ubuntu-instal...@lists.ubuntu.com
>
> Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
>
> * Package name : usb-creator
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,
usb-creator-hack...@lists.launchpad.net,
ubuntu-instal...@lists.ubuntu.com
Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
* Package name : usb-creator
Version : 0.2.23
Upstream Author : Evan Dandrea
* URL
On 24 May 2010 12:53, Ignace Mouzannar wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitrijs,
>
> I already own an ITP for usb-creator [1].
>
reportbug failed to bring it up =( annoyed. Sorry about this.
> I have started working on it. I should be releasing it soon.
>
Is your work available anywhere to see? What changes have
On 24 May 2010 12:15, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 05/24/2010 12:55 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,
>> usb-creator-hack...@lists.launchpad.net,
>> ubuntu-instal...@lists.ubuntu.com
>>
>> Owner: Dmitrijs Le
On 24 May 2010 12:43, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 05/24/2010 01:27 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
* Package name : usb-creator
>>>
>>> "usb-creator" is a bit misleading (or at least… not clear). Could
>>> you rename it into something like "live-usb-creator"?
>>>
>>
>> This package has been
Here is the current dsc ready for upload to Debian (with last minute
fixes to debrand package description)
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/u/usb-creator/usb-creator_0.2.23.dsc
also pushed as a branch lp:~dmitrij.ledkov/usb-creator/debian
(temporary branch intended to be merged with lp:
On 05/24/2010 12:55 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-de...@lists.debian.org,
>usb-creator-hack...@lists.launchpad.net,
>ubuntu-instal...@lists.ubuntu.com
>
> Owner: Dmitrijs Ledkovs
>
> * Package name: usb-creator
"usb-c
On 05/24/2010 01:27 PM, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
>>>
>>> * Package name: usb-creator
>>
>> "usb-creator" is a bit misleading (or at least… not clear). Could
>> you rename it into something like "live-usb-creator"?
>>
>
> This package has been shipped in Ubuntu for a few releases now.
Hones
35 matches
Mail list logo
