With the permission of Rocky, I am forwarding his reply here verbatim:
I am in Crackow right now and my Internet setup is not quite ideal.
Below is why pyimport relative is used. I will reply in full when I get
back in about a week. But here are the salient points
Python's import re
[Luca Falavigna, 2010-05-27]
> Personally, I think it's better asking pydbgr upstream to see if there's
> chance to adjust code to use relative imports provided by python2.5,
> unless implementation is way too different to be impossible to do otherwise.
... or not use relative imports at all
--
P
mh, probably I'm missing something:
- is pyimport-relative only available for 2.4?
- is pyimport-relative an incompatible implementation of relative
imports as present in python >=2.5 ?
- would it be possible to "port" to relative import as in python >=
2.5 and declare pydbgr as only available for
This is relative to pyimport-relative package, currently in NEW. These
are considerations taken with Debian maintainer, and before going any
further, I'd like to share some thoughts with Debian Python maintainers.
Il 12/05/2010 21.24, Yaroslav Halchenko ha scritto:
> Hi Luca,
>
> This package is
4 matches
Mail list logo
