Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:23:22AM +0200, Petri Lehtinen wrote:
> > Looks good to me, but shouldn't the -dev package be just
> > libjansson-dev rather than libjansson4-dev?
>
> According to the Debian Library Packaging guide [0] using the libfooX-dev
> namescheme is pre
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:23:22AM +0200, Petri Lehtinen wrote:
> Looks good to me, but shouldn't the -dev package be just
> libjansson-dev rather than libjansson4-dev?
According to the Debian Library Packaging guide [0] using the libfooX-dev
namescheme is preferred, but the other solution is good
Looks good to me, but shouldn't the -dev package be just
libjansson-dev rather than libjansson4-dev?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110323082322.GB5
3 matches
Mail list logo