On 10/08/2010 08:25 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Please don't upload to unstable during the freeze and use experimental
instead.
1.3.4-1 is now in experimental. Sorry for taking so long, everyone.
I'll close this bug when the unstable upload is done (after squeeze).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On 08/10/2010 13:57, Philipp Huebner wrote:
>
> In my opinion an NMU is appropriate now. And then somebody needs to go
> through all the open bugs and see if they're still relevant.
>
> I would like to do it, but am currently too busy.
>
> As written before, I'd be willing to sponsor the upload
Hi!
On 08/10/10 13:40, Luís Picciochi Oliveira wrote:
> The synergy and synergy+ projects merged back into synergy some time
> ago. This means that there's no need to create a new package, but just
> to update the existing one.
These are great news!
I pinged Jeff in August, and his private reas
Hi,
The synergy and synergy+ projects merged back into synergy some time ago.
This means that there's no need to create a new package, but just to update
the existing one.
See: http://code.google.com/p/synergy-plus/
and: http://synergy-foss.org
Best regards,
Pitxyoki
Hello,
Yes, if Jeff doesn't, i'd be glad to maintain it. I also like the idea
of doing it as a team.
--
Clément Lorteau
www.lorteau.net
2010/7/13 Philipp Huebner
>
> Package: wnpp
>
> Hey guys,
>
> just found out about synergy-plus. I'm using it now and it works much more
> reliable than the
Package: wnpp
Hey guys,
just found out about synergy-plus. I'm using it now and it works much more
reliable than the original synergy.
I would like to see it in Debian ASAP.
@Jeff Licquia: are you willing to change the synergy package over to the
maintenance fork synergy-plus?
If not,
@Clémen
6 matches
Mail list logo
