Bug#541207: gt.m: changing back from ITP to RFP

2013-05-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi, status update: The packaging of gt.m is done by the Debian Med team and the discussion happens on the according mailing list. The first upload will happen after the next upstream release (which is expected in the next couple of weeks) because of some changes in the build system. The packagi

Bug#541207: gt.m: changing back from ITP to RFP

2013-05-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 541207 RFP: gt.m -- Database Engine with Extreme Scalability and Robustness noowner 541207 tag 541207 - pending thanks Hi, This is an automatic email to change the status of gt.m back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity dur

Bug#541207: gt.m: changing back from ITP to RFP

2011-02-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/02/11 at 11:42 -0500, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: > > > On 02/20/2011 11:33 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > > On 20/02/11 at 10:23 -0500, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: > > > I manage the group that develops FIS GT.M upstream. Although there has > > > been no evidence of activity on the Debian lists in the l

Bug#541207: gt.m: changing back from ITP to RFP

2011-02-20 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/02/11 at 10:23 -0500, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: > I manage the group that develops FIS GT.M upstream. Although there has > been no evidence of activity on the Debian lists in the last six months, > there has been activity upstream. > > Here is the issue: just as it takes a gcc binary to compile

Bug#541207: gt.m: changing back from ITP to RFP

2011-02-20 Thread Bhaskar, K.S
On 02/20/2011 11:33 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > On 20/02/11 at 10:23 -0500, Bhaskar, K.S wrote: > > I manage the group that develops FIS GT.M upstream. Although there has > > been no evidence of activity on the Debian lists in the last six months, > > there has been activity upstream. > > > >

Bug#541207: gt.m: changing back from ITP to RFP

2011-02-20 Thread Bhaskar, K.S
I manage the group that develops FIS GT.M upstream. Although there has been no evidence of activity on the Debian lists in the last six months, there has been activity upstream. Here is the issue: just as it takes a gcc binary to compile gcc, building GT.M has a bootstrapping step and it takes

Bug#541207: gt.m: changing back from ITP to RFP

2011-02-19 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 541207 RFP: gt.m -- Database Engine with Extreme Scalability and Robustness noowner 541207 thanks Hi, This is an automatic email to change the status of gt.m back from ITP (Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 6 months