Bug#525314: For those who are interested in adopting fte

Hi again, Axel Beckert wrote: > while preparing a QA upload of fte, I noticed that there exists a > maintained fork of fte named efte at > > https://github.com/lanurmi/efte > > You might want to switch upstream to it if you adopt the package. Samuel made me aware of the fact that efte is alre

Bug#525314:

Hi Axel, It looks like efte is already packaged[1]. ​I'm assuming that I should follow the procedure explained here[2] in order to substitute fte with efte, am I right? [1]https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/efte [2]https://wiki.debian.org/Renaming_a_Package Thanks Samuel Henrique O. P. [samueloph]

Bug#525314: For those who are interested in adopting fte

Hi, while preparing a QA upload of fte, I noticed that there exists a maintained fork of fte named efte at https://github.com/lanurmi/efte You might want to switch upstream to it if you adopt the package. Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert , http://people.debian.org/~ab

Bug#525314: fte: changing back from ITA to O

retitle 525314 O: fte -- Text editor for programmers - base package noowner 525314 thanks Hi, This is an automatic email to change the status of fte back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 6 months. If you are still interested in

Bug#525314: O: fte -- Text editor for programmers - base package

Package: wnpp Severity: normal The maintainer of fte Zdenek Kabelac seems to no longer be active. Therefore I am orphaning this package now. If you want to be the new maintainer, please take it -- see http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/index.html#howto-o for detailed instructions how to adopt