Thanks a lot for your effort, I really appreciate it.
Regards,
Pedro
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/p2u74fd948d1005060936l9d664933m81045be711b6a...@
On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 11:17:59PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:02:09PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
>
> > Yeah, in any case we might want to get this in experimental/unstable so we
> > get a feeling
> > how this can be maintained. Also having this beast NEWed is
Your message dated Wed, 05 May 2010 12:17:45 +
with message-id
and subject line Bug#520324: fixed in chromium-browser 5.0.342.9~r43360-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #520324,
regarding ITP: chromium-browser -- A web browser developed by Google based on
the WebKit engine
to be marked as
So not yet ready for testing (and therefore sid), but what about
uploading to experimental for the hungry masses that we are? :)
Thanks for the hard work,
--
Antoine Beaupré
Réseau Koumbit Networks
+1.514.387.6262
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:02:09PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Yeah, in any case we might want to get this in experimental/unstable so we
> get a feeling
> how this can be maintained. Also having this beast NEWed is probably a good
> start ;).
It's in Debian unstable since half a year:
http:
Il 26/04/2010 15:58, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
> (You might want to sign the .dsc though, so that people can have a trust
> path to the .deb-s.)
Signed, thanks!
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
Il 23/04/2010 22:55, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
> That's great news guys, I'm really looking forward for chromium browser
> in unstable ... and if you need a beta tester, ping me :-)
Preliminary i386/amd64 Debian packages can be found here:
http://people.debian.org/~iuculano/chromium/
Ch
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 03:14:43PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Preliminary i386/amd64 Debian packages can be found here:
> http://people.debian.org/~iuculano/chromium/
Wonderful!, thanks.
I'll given them a try and report any problem.
(You might want to sign the .dsc though, so that people c
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 10:41:50PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> > Il 22/04/2010 12:25, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
> > >>> Regarding security issues, I duly notice that Giuseppe is a full member
> > >>> > > of the Debian
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 07:07:01PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Il 22/04/2010 12:25, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
> >>> Regarding security issues, I duly notice that Giuseppe is a full member
> >>> > > of the Debian security team, so I believe we should trust his
> >>> > > judgement
> >>> >
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 01:42:35PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > > BTW, yesterday I uploaded gyp.
> >
> > Thanks and already accepted (interesting to see some packages can go fast ;)
> > I guess nothing prevent to upload a package to experimental now.
>
> OK, I will make this happen over weeke
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:49:29PM +0200, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> Hello
>
> Thanks for adding gyp into sid so far.
>
> > Many Debian users prefers to use Google Chrome repository.
>
> I'm not sure many Debian users prefer to use non-debian repositories. For
> me and our users it's definitely not
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:03:47PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> > We are already tracking[1] chromium security issues, this is another
> > webkit fork and it is a real pain; but given the fact that now we have
> > three members in the webkit security groups (Fathi is one of them), from
> > the Secu
Hello
Thanks for adding gyp into sid so far.
> Many Debian users prefers to use Google Chrome repository.
I'm not sure many Debian users prefer to use non-debian repositories. For
me and our users it's definitely not the case, we prefer to use
Debian repositories exclusively, and our own where
> We are already tracking[1] chromium security issues, this is another
> webkit fork and it is a real pain; but given the fact that now we have
> three members in the webkit security groups (Fathi is one of them), from
> the Security team's (CCed) point of view there is no objections.
good to know
Il 22/04/2010 12:25, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
>>> Regarding security issues, I duly notice that Giuseppe is a full member
>>> > > of the Debian security team, so I believe we should trust his judgement
>>> > > on that.
>> > webkit related security issues are real and I'm well placed to know a
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Hi Giuseppe, many thanks for your offer, personally I'd like you to go
> ahead with your packaging work on chromium-browser to at least have the
> *possibility* of getting the package in squeeze. That means having it in
> unstable first,
> webkit related security issues are real and I'm well placed to know about it.
oups, I mean chromium here :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/o2u6a2e
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 01:10:12PM +0300, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> > *possibility* of getting the package in squeeze. That means having it in
> > unstable first, then we'll use the usual rules for transition to testing
> > of all other packages.
> or experimental.
Yup, exactly, with the added benefit
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 03:12:56AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > > Is there a specific reason why you (Chromium team) uploaded
> > > chromium-browser in Ubuntu two months ago and not yet in Debian?
> > I don't received any answer, so I'm going to take over this ITP in order
> > to get chromium-b
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
>> The problem is that chromium browser cannot be maintained in a debian
>> stable relase as it is. If you think different talk to me on IRC.
>>
>> Let's wait how bad it blows up once ubuntu lucid enters stable release mode.
>>
>
> Just fo
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 03:12:56AM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:14:59PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> > I don't received any answer, so I'm going to take over this ITP in order
> > to get chromium-browser in time for squeeze.
> >
> > I requested an alioth group, fe
owner 520324 a...@debian.org
thanks
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:14:59PM +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> owner 520324 !
> thanks
>
> Il 27/03/2010 17:14, Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto:
> > Hi Alexander,
> >
> > Il 26/03/2010 12:24, Alexander Sack ha scritto:
> >> Just pull and build the ubuntu pa
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 520324 a...@debian.org
Bug #520324 [wnpp] ITP: chromium-browser -- A web browser developed by Google
based on the WebKit engine
Bug #537228 [wnpp] RFP: google-chrome -- Web browser
Owner changed from Giuseppe Iuculano to a...@debian.
owner 520324 !
thanks
Il 27/03/2010 17:14, Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto:
> Hi Alexander,
>
> Il 26/03/2010 12:24, Alexander Sack ha scritto:
>> Just pull and build the ubuntu package.
>
> Is there a specific reason why you (Chromium team) uploaded
> chromium-browser in Ubuntu two months ago and
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> owner 520324 !
Bug #520324 [wnpp] ITP: chromium-browser -- A web browser developed by Google
based on the WebKit engine
Bug #537228 [wnpp] RFP: google-chrome -- Web browser
Owner changed from a...@debian.org to Giuseppe Iuculano .
Owner chan
Is there any possibility to get this into Squeeze?
Regards
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/k2j74fd948d1004151717tdc7fa2bfv8d4b676caa11e...@mail.gmail
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 05:38:52PM +0100, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> > Just pull and build the ubuntu package.
>
> Thanks. It seems Ubuntu package doesn't build as is.
> gyp doesn't exist in Debian.
> timeout is provided by coreutils package.
right ... gyp needs to get in too!! FTA probably could help
> Just pull and build the ubuntu package.
Thanks. It seems Ubuntu package doesn't build as is.
gyp doesn't exist in Debian.
timeout is provided by coreutils package.
Cheers,
Fathi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
> Is there a specific reason why you (Chromium team) uploaded
> chromium-browser in Ubuntu two months ago and not yet in Debian?
just a guess: missing b-d in Debian.
i.e. gyp
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian
Hi Alexander,
Il 26/03/2010 12:24, Alexander Sack ha scritto:
> Just pull and build the ubuntu package.
Is there a specific reason why you (Chromium team) uploaded
chromium-browser in Ubuntu two months ago and not yet in Debian?
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital sig
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:15:56AM +0100, Fathi Boudra wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Could you give us en ETA of the ITP ?
>
> > Can we have unofficial packages while waiting for the official upload ?
>
> seconded. Otherwise, you could give us some quick steps to build our
> own packages :)
Just pull and bu
Hi,
Could you give us en ETA of the ITP ?
> Can we have unofficial packages while waiting for the official upload ?
seconded. Otherwise, you could give us some quick steps to build our
own packages :)
Cheers,
Fathi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
> i hope it comes into squeeze, looking forward for this.
/me too
is there anything we can do to help ?
Cheers,
--
Emmanuel Bouthenot
mail: kol...@{openics,debian}.orggpg: 1024D/0x414EC36E
xmpp: kol...@im.openics.org irc: kol...@{freenode,oftc}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Many of Medical & Business lists are on sale too
Just email me here:cel...@data13.co.cc
I'll get you all the details and samples.
you can stop the mailing by going here please email stopp...@data13.co.cc
--
Este mensaje ha sido analizado por MailScanner
en busca de virus y otros contenidos
> The upload will happen soon ... i am not sure it will go through NEW,
> but the things I thought were issues seems to be not ... so we will
> try as it is ...
Can we have unofficial packages while waiting for the official upload?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian
thanks for the status updates and working on this,
i hope it comes into squeeze, looking forward for this.
guerkan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
You can reach me at my other email address for details:
luisa.quint...@leadsparadise.com
to adjust your subscription status email to disapp...@leadsparadise.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 01:26:23PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:14:13PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > we are making progress on this. the latest bzr branch has a
> > licensecheck.pl that generates dep-5 file copyright.
>
> Hi Alexander, just a big "THANK YOU" fo
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:14:13PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> we are making progress on this. the latest bzr branch has a
> licensecheck.pl that generates dep-5 file copyright.
Hi Alexander, just a big "THANK YOU" for the ongoing work on the
chromium-browser packaging, of course that extends f
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:40:48PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:14:13PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > Only blocking issues are that there are some subtrees licensed GPL or
> > LGPL without any version info given; while those need to be GPLv2 or
> > later in order to
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 12:00:36AM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:40:48PM -0500, Jimmy Kaplowitz wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:14:13PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > > Only blocking issues are that there are some subtrees licensed GPL or
> > > LGPL without any v
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 02:14:13PM +0100, Alexander Sack wrote:
> Only blocking issues are that there are some subtrees licensed GPL or
> LGPL without any version info given; while those need to be GPLv2 or
> later in order to have a chance to be compatible with Apache 2.0.
The GPL and LGPL when s
Pane Wallace
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
http://download.wikimedia.org/huwiki/20091216/huwiki-20091216-md5sums.txt
Pane Wallace
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Well ... check out our current package in the chromium-daily ppa ...
thats the progress we are making. feel free to help on the licensing
issues left - which is a huge effort still imo ...
the upstream bug on this is here:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=28291
On Fri, Nov 20
Copying Alexander Sack to your question:
* Guido Trotter [2009-11-17 10:42]:
> Hi,
>
> Any news on this? Otherwise it might be wise to retitle as RFP.
> (I will do this in 7 days, if the package is not uploaded, or there is no
> further comment regarding this on the bug).
>
> Thanks,
>
> Guido
Hi,
Any news on this? Otherwise it might be wise to retitle as RFP.
(I will do this in 7 days, if the package is not uploaded, or there is no
further comment regarding this on the bug).
Thanks,
Guido
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
So libv8-0 it's been in Sid for a while now... How's chromium progressing?
:)
Hi Alexander,
I've already packaged libv8-0 (latest 1.3.11 from upstream committed
some days ago to trunk), the package is building fine, lintian clean and
it is waiting for a sponsor (ITP 497701).
Most of the packaging comes from ubuntu but I had to adapt it for Debian;
it is in collab-maint so i
any news since the last week? didn't check out ubuntu's packages, but do
they require major work to be a proper fit for Debian?
--
.-.
=-- /v\ =
Keep in touch// \\ (yoh@|www.)oneru
owner 520324 a...@debian.org
thanks
No response on my offer to take over ITP and no progress on this
ITP. Taking over ownership. Will work with/as part of the
chromium-team in launchpad to get this package into
debian.
- Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian
Hi,
we have a ready to use chromium package already and would like to take
over this ITP together with you. would that be ok with you? Otherwise
please join the https://edge.launchpad.net/~chromium-team where we do
those packages.
- Alexander
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
wrote:
> > * Package name : chromium
> > Version : x.y.z
> > Upstream Author : Name
> > * URL : http://www.example.org/
> > * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
> > Programming Lang: (C, C++, C#,
Hi!
Luke Faraone schrieb:
> * Package name: chromium
> Version : x.y.z
> Upstream Author : Name
> * URL : http://www.example.org/
> * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
> Programming Lang: (C, C++, C#, Perl, Python, etc.)
> Description : A web br
Package: wnpp
Owner: Luke Faraone
Severity: wishlist
* Package name : chromium
Version : x.y.z
Upstream Author : Name
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Programming Lang: (C, C++, C#, Perl, Python, etc.)
Description
56 matches
Mail list logo
