about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
515793: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515793
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package
Hi,
On 19-02-14 00:47, YAEGASHI Takeshi wrote:
Oxan, have you already worked on your own cgit package built with
something like git-source binary package? Please let me know if you
made any progress. I might be able to contribute to your package!
No, unfortunately I hadn't made any progress.
Hi Jonathan,
2014-02-19 8:58 GMT+09:00 Jonathan Nieder :
> I can write a patch demonstrating what I mean making use of your
> packaging from http://git.keshi.org/debian/cgit.git if you like. What
> do you think?
I appreciate your help and would like to see how it will go with the
git package wit
Hi,
YAEGASHI Takeshi wrote:
> I know such a package is undesirable, but I wonder if it's completely
> unacceptable for the Debian distribution.
As mentioned a few times before, I think it would be simplest to just
add cgit to the git package. If someone using cgit wants to be a
co-maintainer I'
if you
made any progress. I might be able to contribute to your package!
Thanks,
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=515793
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739231
[3] http://debian.keshi.org/cgit/
[4] http://git.keshi.org/debian/cgit.git
[5] https://
Hi,
On 04-08-13 00:59, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I'd like to propse another solution for this: let git build a git-source
binary package, and build cgit using that package.
I would prefer not to go this way. It would mean that when I make git
uploads, they'd always have a chance of breaking the
Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Oxan van Leeuwen wrote:
>> On 29-07-12 18:19, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>>> I would be very happy to see cgit in Debian. Perhaps we could
>>> approach this by building cgit from the git source package, either
>>> using dpkg source format 3.0's multiple-tarball feature or by
Hi,
Oxan van Leeuwen wrote:
> On 29-07-12 18:19, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> I would be very happy to see cgit in Debian. Perhaps we could
>> approach this by building cgit from the git source package, either
>> using dpkg source format 3.0's multiple-tarball feature or by
>> including cgit in the
Hi Jonathan, Marc,
On 29-07-12 18:19, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I would be very happy to see cgit in Debian. Perhaps we could
approach this by building cgit from the git source package, either
using dpkg source format 3.0's multiple-tarball feature or by
including cgit in the Debian patch.
Would
It seems like there was some work done on creating a cgit debian package by
Stefan Bühler.
See http://stbuehler.de/debianserver/cgit.html
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> Marc Singer wrote:
>
> > Do you need my help?
>
> Yes, because I do not use cgit. We would need an active user to make
> sure it keeps working and to evaluate requests that come in through
> the BTS.
>
> In other words, I do
Hi Marc,
Marc Singer wrote:
> Do you need my help?
Yes, because I do not use cgit. We would need an active user to make
sure it keeps working and to evaluate requests that come in through
the BTS.
In other words, I do not want to be the cgit package maintainer, even
though I'd be fine with hav
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> Marc Singer wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Jonathan Nieder
> wrote:
>
> >> Did you mean this to be a private reply?
> >
> > Not really.
>
> Ok, cc-ing the bug.
>
> [...]
> > The policy of the git authors is their
Hi Marc,
Marc Singer wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
>> Did you mean this to be a private reply?
>
> Not really.
Ok, cc-ing the bug.
[...]
> The policy of the git authors is their prerogative. They've made it very
> clear that they will not support a shared li
Hi Marc,
Marc Singer wrote:
> The upstream build of cgit requires a download of git to build libgit
> which this package links statically. Thus, this package practically
> depends on a change to git-core.
>
> http://hjemli.net/git/cgit/
I would be very happy to see cgit in Debian. Perhaps we
retitle 515793 RFP: cgit -- C-code Web Front-end to GIT
noowner 515793
thanks
Hi,
This is an automatic email to change the status of cgit back from ITP
(Intent to Package) to RFP (Request for Package), because this bug hasn't seen
any activity during the last 6 months.
If you are still intereste
Am Montag, den 15.03.2010, 12:47 -0700 schrieb Marc Singer:
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, den 07.03.2010, 15:51 -0800 schrieb Marc Singer:
> > > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Paul Menzel > > wrote:
> > > > Am Dienstag, den 17.02.2009, 09:40 -0800 schrieb Ma
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 2:26 AM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 07.03.2010, 15:51 -0800 schrieb Marc Singer:
> > On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Paul Menzel >wrote:
> > > Am Dienstag, den 17.02.2009, 09:40 -0800 schrieb Marc Singer:
> > > > The upstream build of cgit requires a download of g
Am Sonntag, den 07.03.2010, 15:51 -0800 schrieb Marc Singer:
> On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> > Am Dienstag, den 17.02.2009, 09:40 -0800 schrieb Marc Singer:
> > > The upstream build of cgit requires a download of git to build libgit
> > > which this package links statically.
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Paul Menzel wrote:
> Dear Marc,
>
>
> Am Dienstag, den 17.02.2009, 09:40 -0800 schrieb Marc Singer:
> > The upstream build of cgit requires a download of git to build libgit
> > which this package links statically. Thus, this package practically
> > depends on a ch
Dear Marc,
Am Dienstag, den 17.02.2009, 09:40 -0800 schrieb Marc Singer:
> The upstream build of cgit requires a download of git to build libgit
> which this package links statically. Thus, this package practically
> depends on a change to git-core.
>
> http://hjemli.net/git/cgit/
the blocki
Okay I answer myself. I haven't read about the bug that blocks this one.
--
Regards,
Pablo.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hello.
What's the status of this ITP?
Any progress?
Regards,
Pablo.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 07:14:45PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> Also, it doesn't look like you're a DD. Why are you so keen to
> maintain it?
Please consider refraining to post comments like this in the
future. Your intention might have been good, but written as you wrote
it, it can discourage non
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
The upstream build of cgit requires a download of git to build libgit
which this package links statically. Thus, this package practically
depends on a change to git-core.
http://hjemli.net/git/cgit/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.deb
25 matches
Mail list logo
