Bug#504058: marked as done (ITP: zotero-standalone-build -- program to collect, manage and cite bibliographic information and LibreOffice integration)

Your message dated Wed, 15 May 2013 19:00:39 + with message-id and subject line Bug#504058: fixed in zotero-standalone-build 3.0.11.1-26-g08fb709-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #504058, regarding ITP: zotero-standalone-build -- program to collect, manage and cite bibliographic

Bug#504058: marked as done (ITP: zotero-standalone-build -- program to collect, manage and cite bibliographic information and LibreOffice integration)

Your message dated Wed, 15 May 2013 19:00:11 + with message-id and subject line Bug#504058: fixed in zotero-standalone-build 4.0.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #504058, regarding ITP: zotero-standalone-build -- program to collect, manage and cite bibliographic information and

Bug#504058: marked as done (ITP: zotero-standalone-build -- program to collect, manage and cite bibliographic information and LibreOffice integration)

Your message dated Wed, 15 May 2013 19:00:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#504058: fixed in zotero-standalone-build 4.0.6-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #504058, regarding ITP: zotero-standalone-build -- program to collect, manage and cite bibliographic information and

Processed: Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#504058: Zotero Update

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > noowner 639025 Bug #639025 [wnpp] ITP: zotero-libreoffice -- LibreOffice integration for Zotero Removed annotation that Bug was owned by Mirosław Zalewski . > merge 504058 639025 Bug #504058 [wnpp] RFP: zotero -- program to collect, mana

Bug#504058: Zotero Update

> While I agree that both packages should come from the same source, after > having heavily discussed with Michele Cane (who actually offered help in > this same ITP [1]) we went ahead and both packages (zotero-standalone > and the LO integration) are on their way to be uploaded [2]. The merge >

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#504058: Zotero Update

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > merge 504058 639025 Bug #504058 [wnpp] RFP: zotero -- program to collect, manage and cite bibliographic information Bug #651930 [wnpp] RFP: zotero -- program to collect, manage and cite bibliographic information Unable to merge bugs beca

Bug#504058: Zotero Update

[1]) we went ahead and both packages (zotero-standalone and the LO integration) are on their way to be uploaded [2]. The merge can be done later on, also considering that the last uploaded version for xul-ext-zotero is 10-month-old. [1] <http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=50405

Bug#504058: packaging of zotero standalone

Hi, I have completed the packaging of zotero standalone (along with the libreoffice integration). You can find the package here for testing: http://alioth.debian.org/~heiserhorn-guest/debian/heiserhorn-unstable/ You can test it if you want and I hope it will be uploaded in the next weeks in uns

Bug#504058: Zotero Update

retitle 504058 RFP: zotero -- program to collect, manage and cite bibliographic information thanks Thanks Andreas for kicking me. :) I'm not likely to get around to packaging soon this so I hope somebody else can take this over. The package is not trivial and I have no done a xulrunner package b

Bug#504058: Change from ITP to RFP ?

This issue is marked ITP since January 2011. Is anyone working on it or should it be changed to RFP ? Cheers, Andreas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/

Bug#504058: (no subject)

Hi all About two weeks ago Zotero 3.0 got released. This release features final version of standalone client. I got no problem running it under my Debian testing (AMD64), so I guess building should be smooth too. There is link for source code: (I

Bug#504058:

Just FYI, .dsc can be found at: http://mentors.debian.net/package/xul-ext-zotero It builds fine on debian/squeeze, however iceweasel 3.5.16-10 seems to old for the plugin since iceweasel reveals: Zotero 2.1.8 Not compatible with Iceweasel 3.5.16 2cts -- Mathieu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#504058: Zotero standalone

Hi, Now that Zotero standalone is in beta i thought it would be nice to have it in Debian. I came across this ITP and I would like to give a hand to package and maintain the package. Have someone already took some steps? Cheers -- Michele Cane

Bug#504058: RFS: xul-ext-zotero

Hi Benjamin, I have packaged Zotero the Iceweasel extension, and have uploaded to mentors.debian.net (as package "xul-ext-zotero"). It can be found here: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xul-ext-zotero/ I have also made an announcement in debian-mentors looking for a sponsor: http://

Bug#504058: Packaging Zotero in Debian

http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504058#37 > The next version of Zotero is being developed as a standalone > application [which] should be packaged in Debian. Agreed. > I am a maintainer and very heavy Zotero user and I am happy to do it. Thanks. > Please conta

Bug#504058: Packaging Zotero in Debian

Hi Benjamin, thanks for the update -- I did not know about standalone version being under development. It would indeed indeed be nice to get it packaged -- I am still Zotero user, thanks in advance > Please contact me if you want to work on this or help, etc. please accept etc == inspira

Bug#504058: Packaging Zotero in Debian

retitle 504058 ITP: zotero -- program to collect, manage and cite bibliographic information thanks The conversation on this bug seemed to end two years ago with no consensus on what to do. Some people suggested that it would be useful to have the Zotero extension packaged in Debian. Others disagr

Bug#504058: Dear Account User

Dear Account User This Email is from gmail Customer Care and we are sending it to every gmail Email User Accounts Owner for safety. we are having congestions due to the anonymous registration of gmail accounts so we are shutting down some gmail accounts and your account was among those to be de

Bug#504058: Zotero license and what packaging benefit?

> >> It is unclear to me what benefit making a package would > >> bring. > > exactly the same benefits as any other package of firefox extension: > Presumably these benefits are minor, as there are relatively few firefox > extensions in the package repositories. I bet your pardon, their 'minor' i

Bug#504058: Zotero license and what packaging benefit?

Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: >> It is unclear to me what benefit making a package would >> bring. > exactly the same benefits as any other package of firefox extension: Presumably these benefits are minor, as there are relatively few firefox extensions in the package repositories. > zotero needs

Bug#504058: Zotero license and what packaging benefit?

On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 03:06:22AM -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > The extension can be easily downloaded from zotero.org & works as-is > > under Debian. It is unclear to me what benefit making a package would > > bring. now that I am trying it -- here is 1 Debian-specifics, which would

Bug#504058: Zotero license and what packaging benefit?

> The extension can be easily downloaded from zotero.org & works as-is > under Debian. It is unclear to me what benefit making a package would > bring. exactly the same benefits as any other package of firefox extension: 1. point of entry to install it would be the same as for any other Debia

Bug#504058: Zotero license and what packaging benefit?

It is not available under the GPL, but under the Educational Community License v. 1.0. This is a free/open license that is used by Sakai, the Fedora institutional repository software, and a few other projects. None of these are in Debian main currently. (There have been remarks some time ago

Bug#504058: RFP: Zotero -- Firefox addon to collect, manage and cite bibliographic information; also has plugin for OpenOffice.Org

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist *** Please type your report below this line *** Zotero (zotero.org) is one the best pieces of bibliography manager software out there that I have seen in recent years. It is open source and GPL, IIRC, and should be okay with Debian's policy of licensing. It is a F