Bug#496264: cuneiform_0.6.0+dfsg-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2009-05-17 Thread Mike O'Connor
Hi, maintainer, We should be figuring out what the .dat files are, THEN (maybe) putting it in the archive, not the other way around. bye, stew === Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our conce

Bug#496264: cuneiform_0.6.0+dfsg-1_i386.changes REJECTED

2009-05-17 Thread Daniel Baumann
Mike O'Connor wrote: > We should be figuring out what the .dat files are, THEN (maybe) putting it in > the archive, not the other way around. you are wrong, please read the ITP. the dat files are the dictionaries for the ocr. the problem which Frank was pointing out, and which is confirmed by ups