* fixed pkginfo files for static linking
* add 32 bit compatibility libs for preloading to Skype
libv4l_0.3.9-2.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.0
Source: libv4l
Binary: libv4l, libv4l-dev, lib32v4l, lib32v4l-dev
Architecture: any
Ver
Hi,
I've packaged the new v0.3.9. Improvements over v0.3.7:
* Build static libs (patch sent upstream)
* Install pkgconfig files
* Use quilt for patch management
Still missing/unchecked:
* copyright file
* shlibs stuff
Cheers,
Gregor
libv4l_0.3.9-1.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip
-BE
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:54:51PM +0200, Gregor Jasny wrote:
> Hi,
Hi :)
> today I've started to package libv4l. Open issues:
> * Would it make sense to split the package into 3 libs, 3 -dev and maybe
> 2 preload libs? To me it seems to be pure overkill. Policy §8.1 seems to
> allow stuffin
Hi,
today I've started to package libv4l. Open issues:
* Would it make sense to split the package into 3 libs, 3 -dev and maybe
2 preload libs? To me it seems to be pure overkill. Policy §8.1 seems to
allow stuffing all libs into one package
* not sure if copyright file is correct
* test with
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 09:10:07PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In particular, the library is included in v4l-dvb tree, so it perhaps
> > should
> > be packaged from something bigger taken from there...
>
> Given that it is not tightly coupled wi
Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> In particular, the library is included in v4l-dvb tree, so it perhaps should
> be packaged from something bigger taken from there...
Given that it is not tightly coupled with v4l-dvb, I do not see what
you'd gain by coupling the library to somethi
Le Wednesday 09 July 2008 19:13:50 Julien BLACHE, vous avez écrit :
> Hi,
Hi all !
> > Romain offered collaboration to the job, I hope he still can take over
> > the effort to package it. He has the right to (not) add me as uploader,
> > for the near future I am going to be rather passive
Domenico Andreoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> Romain offered collaboration to the job, I hope he still can take over
> the effort to package it. He has the right to (not) add me as uploader,
> for the near future I am going to be rather passive. Sorry.
Romain, what are your plans?
Thanks f
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 03:20:20PM +0200, Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Hi Domenico,
Hi,
> Do you have preliminary packages for libv4l already? If yes, can you
> put them up somewhere? I'd like to grab them to try out libv4l for
> SANE.
Unfortunately I have not. While I am very interested in this libra
9 matches
Mail list logo
