On Friday 16 May 2008, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> how does it compare to funionfs?
Compare the sources yourself ;) Funionfs has all code in a very few files,
only a very few comments and then some of these in French...
On the other hand, unionfs-fuse is well structured, has many comments, uses
lots
Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> how does it compare to funionfs?
Simpler and better structured code. And it has all the features we
need and use.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
how does it compare to funionfs?
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://people.panthera-systems.net/~daniel-baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Bernd Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: unionfs-fuse
Version : 0.9.19~hg
Upstream Author : Radek Podgorny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bernd Schubert <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://podgorny.cz/moin/UnionFsFuse
* License
4 matches
Mail list logo
