Bug#478323: I could package Knoplerfish's Framework only

2010-02-13 Thread Eric Lavarde
retitle 478323 ITP: knopflerfish-osgi -- Knopflerfish framework implementation of OSGi thanks As described below, I'll package the framework part, and place it under Java maintainer control, so that anybody willing to add the bundles could do it relatively easily. Thanks, Eric Sveinung Kvil

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#478323: I could package Knoplerfish's Framework only

2010-02-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 478323 ITP: knopflerfish-osgi -- Knopflerfish framework Bug #478323 [wnpp] RFP: knopflerfish -- Knopflerfish is an implementation of OSGi Changed Bug title to 'ITP: knopflerfish-osgi -- Knopflerfish framework' from 'RFP: knopflerfish --

Bug#478323: I could package Knoplerfish's Framework only

2010-02-13 Thread Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik
> Question: should I close as well the RTP bug, or do you need also the > bundles part? Feel free to close it as I no longer need the bundles. > BTW, I plan to rename the source packge to 'knoplerfish-osgi' and the binary > to 'libknoplerfish-osgi-framework-java' (and someone could then later add

Bug#478323: I could package Knoplerfish's Framework only

2010-02-13 Thread Eric Lavarde
Hello, in order to package freeplane [1], I need only the framework part of the complete set, and it's pretty easy to package as there is only one dependency on libasm3-java. Question: should I close as well the RTP bug, or do you need also the bundles part? I'm asking because the bug is al