On Saturday 26 January 2008 00:11:09 Guus Sliepen wrote:
[...]
> > - Is there really a need to have 2 "utils" binary packages? They
> > even conflict with each other, and the "22" doesn't seem to make
> > any sense in this case.
>
> Hm, I agree that the "22" in the utils package is unnecessary
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 07:40:04PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:15:09PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:18:14PM +0200, Peter Antoniac wrote:
[...]
> > I also added Conflicts with 20, because some people might have installed
> > that one from expe
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:15:09PM +0100, Guus Sliepen wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 11:18:14PM +0200, Peter Antoniac wrote:
>
> > > - Missing and incorrect Conflicts: entries in the control file for Debian.
> >
> > If you mean the Conflicts with 11 and 13, we don't want those two packages
>
3 matches
Mail list logo
