* Joerg Jaspert:
> On 11583 March 1977, Gerrit Pape wrote:
>
> As i got asked for the complete text of the rejection mail, as the
> thread start only had a partial quote, here it is.
Thanks!
> First - the packaging is nowhere near the standard Debian aspires to in the
> archive:
>
> Qmail is an
Twas brillig at 00:40:50 01.12.2008 UTC+01 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre and
gimble:
Md> I need to remind everybody that sadly it is a dependency of Plesk
Md> (the only high quality administration panel software) so it's still
Md> going to be installed anyway on many Debian servers.
Md> Ma
On Nov 30, Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Qmail is dead upstream and requires a whole set of patches to even begin to
> work in the manner expected of a modern MTA. Given this, the fact that this
> means there is also no upstream security support, and the fact that Debian
> already co
On 11583 March 1977, Gerrit Pape wrote:
As i got asked for the complete text of the rejection mail, as the
thread start only had a partial quote, here it is.
--88---
From: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: netqmail_1.06-1_powerpc.
Hi, I'm quite surprised how the inclusion of qmail and related packages
into sid is handled, or rather not handled, by the ftpmasters.
Within a time-frame of six months I received exactly one rejection mail in
response to two uploads of the packages, a reply to the rejection mail,
and three mails
5 matches
Mail list logo
