Bug#442032: CPAL

2007-09-28 Thread Marc O'Brien
This does not seem relevant to OpenProj. There is no splash screen required only a small attribution as noted in Exhibit B of the OpenProj license. Manoj Srivastava wrote: Hi, The comments below might not apply to the current package, but are addressed to some of the troubling aspect

Bug#442032: CPAL (was: Bug#442032: ITP: openproj -- A desktop replacement for Microsoft Project. It is capable of sharing files with Microsoft Project...)

2007-09-27 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, The comments below might not apply to the current package, but are addressed to some of the troubling aspects of the license. , | 14. ADDITIONAL TERM: ATTRIBUTION | (a) As a modest attribution to the organizer of the development of | the Original Code ("Original Devel

Bug#442032: CPAL (was: Bug#442032: ITP: openproj -- A desktop replacement for Microsoft Project. It is capable of sharing files with Microsoft Project...)

2007-09-17 Thread Laurent Chretienneau
Would you explain:- - can section 14 be a requirement to display an advert and must the openproj software display such an advert? (possible DFSG 3 problem) No advertising is required simply the OpenProj logo as noted in the Exhibit (see below). - why is NPL replaced with CPAL in section

Bug#442032: CPAL (was: Bug#442032: ITP: openproj -- A desktop replacement for Microsoft Project. It is capable of sharing files with Microsoft Project...)

2007-09-15 Thread MJ Ray
Laurent Chretienneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The CPAL is an OSI approved license. That's informative, but not sufficient to show that *software* under that licence follows the DFSG. (OSI has lawyers advocating licences, while debian looks at software for users.) Would you explain:- - can s

Bug#442032: CPAL (was: Bug#442032: ITP: openproj -- A desktop replacement for Microsoft Project. It is capable of sharing files with Microsoft Project...)

2007-09-14 Thread ajdlinux
On 9/15/07, Laurent Chretienneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The CPAL is an OSI approved license. Debian, as well as the FSF, has rejected many OSI-approved licenses before. (Being OSI-approved does of course mean you've come most of the way to being DFSG-free, but a lot of OSI approved licenses

Bug#442032: CPAL (was: Bug#442032: ITP: openproj -- A desktop replacement for Microsoft Project. It is capable of sharing files with Microsoft Project...)

2007-09-14 Thread Laurent Chretienneau
The CPAL is an OSI approved license. Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked: On 9/13/07, Laurent Chretienneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: * License : (CPAL) Seems like another MPL-based license. Any volunteers for reviewing it? (I don't have time atm.) Differen

Bug#442032: CPAL (was: Bug#442032: ITP: openproj -- A desktop replacement for Microsoft Project. It is capable of sharing files with Microsoft Project...)

2007-09-14 Thread MJ Ray
Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked: > On 9/13/07, Laurent Chretienneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * License : (CPAL) > > Seems like another MPL-based license. Any volunteers for reviewing it? > (I don't have time atm.) Differences from the MPL, found with a wdiff: > 3.6 Distr

Bug#442032: CPAL (was: Bug#442032: ITP: openproj -- A desktop replacement for Microsoft Project. It is capable of sharing files with Microsoft Project...)

2007-09-12 Thread Andrew Donnellan
On 9/13/07, Laurent Chretienneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Laurent Chretienneau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Package name: openproj > Version : 0.9.4 > Upstream Author : Projity Inc. > * URL : http://www.openproj.org > * License