Bug#421745: RFA: bigloo -- A practical Scheme compiler

2007-05-07 Thread Manuel Serrano
Hello Yann, > Well, the main problem is that I do not have enough time to take care > of the package, so in fact I have not checked 2.9a and the 3.0 > prereleases at all. Eventually I'll package them, and I'd be glad to > see the platform issues solved - but this package would really benefit > fr

Bug#421745: RFA: bigloo -- A practical Scheme compiler

2007-05-02 Thread Yann Dirson
Hello Manuel, On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 05:16:07PM +0200, Manuel Serrano wrote: > I'm a little bit confused. Is there something I should do? Do you still have > a portability issue? As far as I can tell all the platform incompatibility > issues have now been fixed. Please let me known if you still f

Bug#421745: RFA: bigloo -- A practical Scheme compiler

2007-05-02 Thread Manuel Serrano
Hello Yann, > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > My primary focus is on other things these days, and this package would > benefit from someone using it more than I do, so this is the formal > request for adoption for the bigloo package. > > Some of the work to do on the package: > - package ne

Bug#421745: RFA: bigloo -- A practical Scheme compiler

2007-05-01 Thread Yann Dirson
Package: wnpp Severity: normal My primary focus is on other things these days, and this package would benefit from someone using it more than I do, so this is the formal request for adoption for the bigloo package. Some of the work to do on the package: - package new upstream release - activate t