Bug#402226: lie_2.2.2-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Only in non-free. If you want it in main or contrib then the source has to be included. DFSG #2 Someone else will have to do that then, I don't have time to dig through CWEB sources. I think you're being too picky about this. The DFSG defines what is acceptable for main, and that simply says "

Bug#402226: lie_2.2.2-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Only in non-free. If you want it in main or contrib then the source has to be included. DFSG #2 Someone else will have to do that then, I don't have time to dig through CWEB sources. I think you're being too picky about this. Incidentally, I suppose that the source itself will then also have to

Bug#402226: lie_2.2.2-1_i386.changes REJECTED

rejected, the tarball seems to miss the source for manual/manual.dvi. The upstream tarball does not have it either. They have it stored in a CWEB file but extracting it from there is nontrivial and, frankly, isn't worth the effort since the source is not going to change anymore (it hasn't changed

Bug#402226: lie_2.2.2-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 08:54:25 +0200 rejected, the tarball seems to miss the source for manual/manual.dvi. The upstream tarball does not have it either. They have it stored in a CWEB file but extracting it from there is nontrivial and, frankly, isn't worth the effort since the source is not g

Bug#402226: lie_2.2.2-1_i386.changes REJECTED

Hi Maintainer, rejected, the tarball seems to miss the source for manual/manual.dvi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]