Bug#365427: [O: apt-build] Is this package worth adopting or has it been replaced?

2021-04-27 Thread Brian Thompson
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 05:48:48 +0200 Axel Beckert wrote: > Hi, > > No Body wrote: > > Is this package worth adopting or has it been replaced by something > > else? > > There's nothing like it so far AFAIK. apt-src is close, but has a > different focus (modification instead of compile-time optimiza

Bug#365427: Autotests for apt-build utility

2021-04-16 Thread Brian Thompson
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 23:40:07 +0300 =?UTF-8?B?0JrQvtC70Y8g0JPRg9GA0YzQtdCy?= wrote:> I intend to do some refactoring of apt-build, but first I'd like to> write autopkgtests for the package. I have two versions of a simple test> case for install command, and I still can't decide what language use fo

Bug#365427: [O: apt-build] Is this package worth adopting or has it been replaced?

2021-04-16 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, No Body wrote: > Is this package worth adopting or has it been replaced by something > else? There's nothing like it so far AFAIK. apt-src is close, but has a different focus (modification instead of compile-time optimization). > I read the entire bug message history and saw that in 2016 the

Bug#365427: Is this package worth adopting or has it been replaced?

2021-04-16 Thread No Body
Is this package worth adopting or has it been replaced by something else? I read the entire bug message history and saw that in 2016 there was some development going on to replace the package. Has that already been done? If so, then I presume there is no point in adopting this package.

Bug#365427: Autotests for apt-build utility

2018-11-15 Thread Коля Гурьев
I intend to do some refactoring of apt-build, but first I'd like to write autopkgtests for the package. I have two versions of a simple test case for install command, and I still can't decide what language use for tests. In attachment you'll find two identical scripts in Bash and Perl. Comments are

Bug#365427: apt-build: changing back from ITA to O

2012-12-10 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
retitle 365427 O: apt-build -- frontend to apt to build, optimize and install package noowner 365427 tag 365427 - pending thanks Hi, This is an automatic email to change the status of apt-build back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the

Bug#365427: how can I help?

2012-07-01 Thread Dominique Lasserre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Pranith, currently I am working to port apt-build completely to AptPkg module. At the moment I have implemented mappings (from AptPkg::Package to AptPkg::Source objects). Now I am looking how to install packages over Perl modules (and how to track

Bug#365427: how can I help?

2012-07-01 Thread Pranith Kumar
Hello, I am looking to get involved in debian development and would like to start with helping this package as I have interest in source compilation. Please let me know how I can help this package get out of adoption. Thanks, Pranith -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debi

Bug#365427: Fast track learning of ExtJS - Exclusive Training Online

2011-09-20 Thread Sulabh J
Dear developers,class="gmail_quote">Thanks a bunch for the interest you have shown in our Online Trainings. Our trainings are now held every weekends and sessions are recorded every time. Presenting this weekend href="http://www.ezdia.com/ma/extjs-training-live.php?utm_source=sj"; tar

Bug#365427: Live Instructor Led Online Training on ExtJS!

2011-03-25 Thread tulsanamarketing
Dear Developers, Your interest and zeal towards learning ExtJS inspired us to arrange another session on ExtJS Simplified. Please join us in a 60-minute walk-through of proven unconventional Extjs Training about how it works, to work on and make widgets in Extjs. ExtJS - Simplified on Satu

Bug#365427: apt-build: changing back from ITA to O

2011-02-19 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
retitle 365427 O: apt-build -- apt-build -- frontend to apt to noowner 365427 thanks Hi, This is an automatic email to change the status of apt-build back from ITA (Intent to Adopt) to O (Orphaned), because this bug hasn't seen any activity during the last 6 months. If you are still interested i

Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#365427: apt-build

2009-11-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle #365427 RFA: apt-build -- apt-build -- frontend to apt to > build, > optimize and install packages like Gentoo-Portage system Bug #365427 [wnpp] ITA: apt-build -- frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages li

Bug#365427: CONTACT E-mail: druvmatindal2...@hotmail.com

2009-05-15 Thread Caroline Meyer
Your email have won $700,000,00 USD, CONTACT E-mail: druvmatindal2...@hotmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#365427: CONTACT E-mail: druvmatindal2...@hotmail.com

2009-05-15 Thread Caroline Meyer
Your email have won $700,000,00 USD, CONTACT E-mail: druvmatindal2...@hotmail.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-wnpp-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#365427: apt-build

2009-02-10 Thread Maximiliano Marin Bustos
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Julien Danjou wrote: > retitle 365427 RFA: apt-build -- frontend to apt to build, optimize and > install packages > noowner 365427 > thanks > > At 1227533769 time_t, Maximiliano Marin Bustos wrote: >> retitle #365427 ITA: apt-build -- frontend to apt to build, opt

Bug#365427: apt-build

2009-02-09 Thread Julien Danjou
retitle 365427 RFA: apt-build -- frontend to apt to build, optimize and install packages noowner 365427 thanks At 1227533769 time_t, Maximiliano Marin Bustos wrote: > retitle #365427 ITA: apt-build -- frontend to apt to build, optimize > and install package > owner #365427 ! > thanks No news fro

Processed: Re: Bug#365427: RFH: apt-build -- Need new developer(s)

2008-06-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 365427 RFA: apt-build -- frontend to apt to build, optimize and > install package Bug#365427: RFH: apt-build -- Need new developer(s) Changed Bug title to `RFA: apt-build -- frontend to apt to build, optimize and install package'

Bug#365427: RFH: apt-build -- Need new developer(s)

2008-06-02 Thread Julien Danjou
retitle 365427 RFA: apt-build -- frontend to apt to build, optimize and install package kthxbye At 1146350555 time_t, Julien Danjou wrote: > I have no time and no interest in working on apt-build, since I never > used it. And I do request its adoption from a lovely maitainer. Cheers, -- Julien

Bug#365427: Volunteer

2007-12-11 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
Found this bug which is a bit old but, if you still need more developers, please let me know. My day job is programming, but I've never contributed to Debian. I figured a RFH would be a good place to start. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365427:

2007-04-30 Thread Zhao Difei
Hi, I am very interested in apt-build and intent to help, is this RFH still activate? Cheers, Difei -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#365427: RFH: apt-build -- Need new developer(s)

2006-07-24 Thread Joseph Smidt
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 11:33:36 +0200 Aurelien Gerome wrote: >It is a nice tool to tackle Gentoo. I will play with it in some weeks >and probably join the team (i.e. you actually) on Alioth. ;) I also will begin testing apt-build over the next few weeks and desire to join the team. I admit I am a fa

Bug#365427: RFH: apt-build -- Need new developer(s)

2006-07-19 Thread Aurélien GÉRÔME
Hi Julien, It is a nice tool to tackle Gentoo. I will play with it in some weeks and probably join the team (i.e. you actually) on Alioth. ;) Cheers, -- ((__,-"""-,__)) Aurélien GÉRÔME .---. `--)~ ~(--` Free Software Developer / \ .-'( )`-. Unix Sys & Net Admin [E

Bug#365427: RFH: apt-build -- Need new developer(s)

2006-04-30 Thread Julien Danjou
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 09:01:05AM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > I'm not sure what you mean here, but Debian already has several tools to > build, test and improve debian source packages. Just to name a few ... > starting from [ the bare apt-get build-dep && --build, several > -buildpackage, de

Bug#365427: RFH: apt-build -- Need new developer(s)

2006-04-29 Thread George Danchev
On Sunday 30 April 2006 01:42, Julien Danjou wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: normal > > Hi, Hello, > apt-build really lacks of support right now. > It works pretty well, but currently it is not capable to deal with > every particular case that it might encounter. > Many improvements could be d

Bug#365427: RFH: apt-build -- Need new developer(s)

2006-04-29 Thread Julien Danjou
Package: wnpp Severity: normal Hi, apt-build really lacks of support right now. It works pretty well, but currently it is not capable to deal with every particular case that it might encounter. Many improvements could be done, mainly by using libapt-pkg-perl and enhancing it (like adding new bind