On Qui, 2005-08-25 at 02:33 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> But that was not the problem you mentioned at the beginning of this
> discussion. "My" upstream archive contained the directory
> 'bluefish-1.0.3.orig' (which is normal, see e.g. cvs-buildpackage or
> dh_make), the upstream tarball the dire
On Ter, 2005-08-23 at 23:14 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Never seen this practice before. And it can be problematic, if you think
> about the practice of handling outdated
> automake/autoconf/intltool/gettext scripts/files. One possibility to
> handle this situation is, that the necessary applica
Am Dienstag, den 23.08.2005, 11:29 -0300 schrieb Leo "Costela" Antunes:
> On Ter, 2005-08-23 at 04:15 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Uploaded to my server. See http://debian.wgdd.de/temp/bluefish/ for
> > source files. debian/control states, that you are the Uploader.
>
> Has this package been
On Ter, 2005-08-23 at 04:15 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Uploaded to my server. See http://debian.wgdd.de/temp/bluefish/ for
> source files. debian/control states, that you are the Uploader.
Has this package been generated with a different source file?
I tried using the source file from the off
On Qua, 2005-08-10 at 21:48 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Is the version on your (Daniel Leidert's) site already cleaned up?
>
> These packages always contain some additional stuff (to send bug-reports
> regarding my packages to me and not to the official BTS). The files in
> the upstream sour
Am Mittwoch, den 10.08.2005, 14:14 -0300 schrieb Leo "Costela" Antunes:
> On Qua, 2005-08-10 at 18:48 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> > Short advice: The source contains obsolete bluefish_icon1.xpm and
> > doubled (bluefish.)postinst and (bluefish.)postrm.
>
> Cool, I didn't want to step on Evo's
[it took me a while to understand it was a different 'Daniel' ;-) ]
On Qua, 2005-08-10 at 18:48 +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Short advice: The source contains obsolete bluefish_icon1.xpm and
> doubled (bluefish.)postinst and (bluefish.)postrm.
Cool, I didn't want to step on Evo's shoes by remo
Am Mittwoch, den 10.08.2005, 11:43 -0300 schrieb Leo "Costela" Antunes:
> On Qua, 2005-08-10 at 16:25 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> > Just one hour ago, I did the 1.0.2 package, I'll upload it to my
> > webserver when I come home this evening :) However, I would like to
> > maintain it for real,
Daniel Leidert wrote:
> But I would suggest an alternative solution: I am member of the upstream
> authors team and I am maintaining the Debian packaging files since a
> while.
Go for it! :)
> Regards, Daniel
Regards, Daniel ^5
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Bib
Hi,
I've noticed you intend to adopt 3 packages. If Bluefish is not very
important to you, I've done the last 3 NMUs for this package, talked to
Evo about taking it over and would like to do so.
This is - of course - no big deal, and if you really intend to adopt it,
by all means, go ahead!
If yo
On Qua, 2005-08-10 at 16:25 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Just one hour ago, I did the 1.0.2 package, I'll upload it to my
webserver when I come home this evening :) However, I would like to
maintain it for real, so can I persuade you for a co-maintainership?
Independently from that, I would b
11 matches
Mail list logo
