Re: Fathi Boudra in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 0) does it make sense to package 0.3.4b now when 0.3.5 is in
> > preparation by upstream?
>
> the package was orphaned and the current version in debian is 0.2.8
> until 0.3.5 will be released, the current stable upstream is 0.3.4b
> Instead of waiting f
> Hi.
hi
> I've grabbed the package from mentors.d.n. Please clarify the
> following points:
>
> 0) does it make sense to package 0.3.4b now when 0.3.5 is in
> preparation by upstream?
the package was orphaned and the current version in debian is 0.2.8
until 0.3.5 will be released, the current s
Re: Fathi BOUDRA in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> i've done an updated package for log4cpp. It's the current stable release for
> the C++ ABI transition (and closes bug #287204).
>
> I'm looking for a sponsor who want to review/upload it.
Hi.
I've grabbed the package from mentors.d.n. Please clarify th
hi,
i've done an updated package for log4cpp. It's the current stable release for
the C++ ABI transition (and closes bug #287204).
I'm looking for a sponsor who want to review/upload it.
My packages are on http://mentors.debian.net
cheers,
Fathi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 02:07:33PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:00:33PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:45:05AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > i forgot to say that you can find my package here :
> > > http://fboudra.free.fr/debian/
Hi,
Fathi Boudra wrote:
> the project restarted, current version is log4cpp-0.3.5rc2 (dated
2005-06-01)
> Only the homepage of the project wasn't updated.
> So what should i do ? prepare an updated package or drop it ?
the primary reason for me to package log4cxx instead of ITA log4cpp
was tha
Le Jeudi 7 Juillet 2005 23:18, martin f krafft a écrit :
> also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.07.07.2307 +0200]:
> > I assume you mean package name rather than soname.
> >
> > In any case, packages that are not yet in the Debian archive are not
> > bound by the C++ ABI transition.
also sprach Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.07.07.2307 +0200]:
> I assume you mean package name rather than soname.
>
> In any case, packages that are not yet in the Debian archive are not bound
> by the C++ ABI transition.
I only just saw this, but: please note that log4cpp is not activ
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 09:00:33PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:45:05AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > i forgot to say that you can find my package here :
> > http://fboudra.free.fr/debian/
> You will need to prepare new packages, because you need to change
> t
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 11:45:05AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i forgot to say that you can find my package here :
> http://fboudra.free.fr/debian/
You will need to prepare new packages, because you need to change
the soname for the g++ transition. The current packages must not be
uploaded a
Hello,
For a work-related project of mine[0], I needed the log4cpp library version
>=0.3.0, and I've prepared packages for the 0.3.5rc1 version. If you want I
can send you my changes, so you can incorporate them to a future version of
your package.
I would love to comaintain, but I'm not a DD, j
hi,
i forgot to say that you can find my package here :
http://fboudra.free.fr/debian/
cheers,
Fathi
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
hi,
i want to do an ITA for the orphaned package log4cpp. so, i'm looking
for a sponsor that can help me to do this task :)
best regards,
Fathi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo
