Your message dated Mon, 11 Jul 2005 10:47:20 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#298106: fixed in kino 0.76-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is no
I'm not planning on adopting Kino in the near future, but shoud some
New Maintainer stand up despite Daniel's warning, I should be able to
do *some* testing (I have a PC with an IEEE 1394 card, as well as a
digital camcorder). I therefore propose sponsorship if needed.
Roland.
--
Roland Mas
Plu
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 07:51:44PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: normal
>
> I'm lacking hardware, knowledge and time to extend all the care it needs
> to the kino package. Therefore, I request an adopter for the kino
> package. Ideally, prospective maintainers chew multim
Hi Daniel!
Daniel Kobras:
> Currently, kino is not part of sarge due to an RC bug on
> big-endian architectures. I'll do my best to fix as much
> of it as possible before handing over the package, but
> parts of it are tricky, and
>
Kino must be a part of sarge, anyway.
Please upload a i386-onl
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm lacking hardware, knowledge and time to extend all the care it needs
to the kino package. Therefore, I request an adopter for the kino
package. Ideally, prospective maintainers chew multimedia formats for
breakfast, know ffmpeg command line options by heart, and
5 matches
Mail list logo
