Bug#248048: wmi ITP

2005-06-01 Thread Christoph Wegscheider
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 10:49:00PM -0700, Matt Taggart wrote: > > as wmi is dead and it's successor wmii was released yesterday I'm going > > to close this bug. > Would it be useful to have both in Debian? Is wmii stable enough yet? Is > there > any reason people would prefer wmi over wmii? Sorry

Bug#248048: wmi ITP

2005-06-01 Thread Matt Taggart
Christoph Wegscheider writes... > Hi, > as wmi is dead and it's successor wmii was released yesterday I'm going > to close this bug. Would it be useful to have both in Debian? Is wmii stable enough yet? Is there any reason people would prefer wmi over wmii? Sorry I didn't get to this yet. > Th

Bug#248048: wmi ITP

2004-11-10 Thread Florian Ragwitz
Hello, On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 11:33:30PM -0800, Matt Taggart wrote: > Back in May you filed an ITP bug for wmi, > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=248048 > > What's going on with that? > I notice on the upstream site ( http://wmi.modprobe.de/ ) that they have a > deb > avail

Bug#248048: wmi ITP

2004-11-10 Thread Matt Taggart
Hi Florian, Back in May you filed an ITP bug for wmi, http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=248048 What's going on with that? I notice on the upstream site ( http://wmi.modprobe.de/ ) that they have a deb available, maintained by Christoph Wegscheider. I found Christoph on #wmi @ ir