On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 12:43:00PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:24:00PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >
> > The original Artistic license is not appropriate for licensing
> > anything that is not approximately perl, because of the way it is
> > worded. It is a terrib
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:24:00PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> The original Artistic license is not appropriate for licensing
> anything that is not approximately perl, because of the way it is
> worded. It is a terrible license. Do not use it. It's also highly
> questionable as to whether t
Andrew Pollock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Package name: elfsign
> Version : 0.2.0
> Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> URL : http://www.hick.org/code/skape/elfsign/
> License : Artistic
> Description : E
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 09:58:35PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:24:00PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> >
> > The original Artistic license is not appropriate for licensing
> > anything that is not approximately perl, because of the way it is
> > worded. It is a terrib
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:24:00PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>
> The original Artistic license is not appropriate for licensing
> anything that is not approximately perl, because of the way it is
> worded. It is a terrible license. Do not use it. It's also highly
> questionable as to whether t
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 02:24:54PM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> Package name: elfsign
> Version : 0.2.0
> Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> URL : http://www.hick.org/code/skape/elfsign/
> License : Artistic
> Description : ELF binary signing a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Package name: elfsign
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
URL : http://www.hick.org/code/skape/elfsign/
License : Artistic
Description : ELF binary signing and verification utilities
This package pr
7 matches
Mail list logo