Em Qui, 2004-03-18 às 15:58, Philipp Hug escreveu:
> sounds good. one thing to think about is support for multiple configuration:
very important...
> there are many options to solve this problem:
> 1. Just one configuration is used e.g. jboss-3.2.3/server/debian/.. all jboss
> sub-packages like d
Konstantinos,
sounds good. one thing to think about is support for multiple configuration:
the standard jboss distribution looks like this:
jboss-3.2.3/bin
jboss-3.2.3/lib
jboss-3.2.3/server/all/..
jboss-3.2.3/server/default/..
jboss-3.2.3/server/minimal/..
there are many options to solve this p
On Thursday 18 March 2004 19:37, Philipp Hug wrote:
> I built a jboss 3.2.3 package a while ago, but it wasn't compliant
> with the debian java policy, because jboss has a lots of jars in
> its own directories. Well, we could combine our efforts. What do
> you think?
Ok, I'm ccing Daniel Ruoso as
I use jboss in debian, and I would be happy to see it packaged, if you
need help, just tell me...
anyway...
i was thinking about it these days... here goes some of my ideas:
* Jboss is a j2ee application server, some applications aren't jboss
specific or any other appserver specific, so, it woul
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Package name: JBoss
> Version : 3.2.3
> Upstream Author : JBoss, Inc
> * URL : http://www.jboss.org/
> * License : (LGPL)
> Description : J2EE based appl
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Also, did you contact Matt Zimmerman, Philipp Hug or Adam Heath? All
> three are mentioned in #120237 (Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Philipp
> Hug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>).
I'm no longer interested. We don't use jboss
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: JBoss
Version : 3.2.3
Upstream Author : JBoss, Inc
* URL : http://www.jboss.org/
* License : (LGPL)
Description : J2EE based application server
There has been another ITP for JBoss but it's more than 2 year
7 matches
Mail list logo
