- Original Message -
From: "TB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mathieu Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: ; "chatiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: Bug#235806: ITP: apt-best -- [...
- Original Message -
From: "Mathieu Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ; "chatiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: Bug#235806: ITP: apt-best -- [...]
> It would be great if the tool propose
On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 11:01:07AM +0100, Mathieu Roy wrote:
> Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 03 March 2004 14:32, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> >> Looks like 'apt for the people' to me. I would not really use the apt
> >> namespace for that package, and have somethin
Stephen Birch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 March 2004 14:32, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
>> Looks like 'apt for the people' to me. I would not really use the apt
>> namespace for that package, and have something that mentions 'packages'
>> in the name, I guess.
>
> Mathieu:
>
> I
So, I think this is an _excellent_ idea for a tool for Debian.
Some other ideas for data sources that might be worth thinking about:
* BTS. How many bugs, and maybe ratio of bugs to installations,
etc.
* Dependencies. How many other packages depend on this one? Gives
a rou
> However, I have to agree with Gustavo regarding the name. This
> isn't really a tool of the same genre as the apt toolset and the name is
> misleading
This program is really related to apt. What it does it to parse the output
of
apt-cache and adds a score to each package line (in that I like apt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 03 March 2004 14:32, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Looks like 'apt for the people' to me. I would not really use the apt
> namespace for that package, and have something that mentions 'packages'
> in the name, I guess.
Mathieu:
I really
Em Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:11:34 +0100, "chatiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> > The name of this package is really really misleading.
>
> I'll change the name to "apt-popular" as sugested by M. Brentrup
> unless there's a better suggestion ...
Looks like 'apt for the people' to me. I would not r
- Original Message -
From: "Mathieu Roy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "chatiman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian Developers List"
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: Bug#235806: ITP: apt-best -- [...]
>
Popularity is in no way synonym of best quality (just think about
which OS is currently the most popular).
The name of this package is really really misleading.
chatiman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: apt-best
> Version : 0.2
>
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:03:19PM +0100, chatiman wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> * Package name: apt-best
> Version : 0.2
> Upstream Author : David RAMBOZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://apt-best.alioth.debian.org/
> * License : GPL
>
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:03:19PM +0100, chatiman wrote:
> * Package name: apt-best
> Version : 0.2
> Upstream Author : David RAMBOZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://apt-best.alioth.debian.org/
> * License : GPL
> Description : apt-best is a utility to
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 05:03:19PM +0100, chatiman wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
>
> * Package name: apt-best
Should probably be renamed to apt-popular or similar, apt-best implies
quality while you check popularity.
> Version : 0.2
> Upstream Author : David RAMB
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: apt-best
Version : 0.2
Upstream Author : David RAMBOZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://apt-best.alioth.debian.org/
* License : GPL
Description : apt-best is a utility to help users in finding the most
po
14 matches
Mail list logo
