* Magnus Ekdahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-27 21:42]:
> IMHO it can be removed given that doxygen is, well really good.
>
> Upstream is active on the bugfixing front, so the program isn't in any
> bad shape.
OK, let's wait a few weeks to see if anyone wants to adopt it.
> public key available
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Magnus Ekdahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-20 23:25]:
*ccdoc C++ interface documentation tool
~ Doxygen is likely to do everything ccdoc does and more.
So should this perhaps be removed (nothing build-depends on it). Is
it still actively developed upstream?
IMHO
* Magnus Ekdahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-01-20 23:25]:
> *ccdoc C++ interface documentation tool
> ~ Doxygen is likely to do everything ccdoc does and more.
So should this perhaps be removed (nothing build-depends on it). Is
it still actively developed upstream?
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROT
3 matches
Mail list logo