In a fit, I have also made a debian package for leo, but for version
4.2 (currently alpha).
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~markn/leo/leo_4.2a4-1_i386.deb
http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~markn/leo/leo_4.2a4-1.diff.gz
We should merge them together; yours is more policy compliant than mine atm.
Let me know your th
On Mon, 24 May 2004 14:20:19 +0200
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You don't get automatically an answer to a ITP. You'll need to go look
> for a sponsor pro-actively, for example by mailing to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] See
> http://people.debian.org/~mpalmer/debian-mentors_FAQ.html
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 02:12:02PM +0200, Xavier Antoviaque wrote:
> On Mon, 24 May 2004 11:33:11 +0200
> Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Xavier, what is the status of packaging leo?
>
> I have never got any answer to my ITP (I am not a Debian developer, so
> I needed someo
On Mon, 24 May 2004 11:33:11 +0200
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Xavier, what is the status of packaging leo?
I have never got any answer to my ITP (I am not a Debian developer, so
I needed someone to review my package and sponsor it), I just gave up.
If someone is willing t
Xavier, what is the status of packaging leo?
Seo: I don't know, I've forwarded your inquiry to the person stating his
intention to package this. Note that that was in December 2002, so a
long time ago.
Please note that no package will get in Debian unless somebody is
interested in packaging and m
What is the current status of Leo packaging? Leo progressed to 4.1
in the meantime. (Not that 3.10 wasn't great. But 4.1 is much
more great!)
I used to be a happy user of Leo on Windows, so I want to see Leo
packaged for Debian.
6 matches
Mail list logo
