Bug#172799: Bug#172800: kernel-patch-acpi

also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.11.2050 +0100]: > I understand. But you asked why _I_ was filing a bug. I filed no bug. Doh! Please excuse, it's been a busy day... -- Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Processed: Re: Bug#172800: kernel-patch-acpi

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reopen 172799 Bug#172799: ITP: ospmd -- ACPI power management daemon Bug reopened, originator not changed. > reopen 172800 Bug#172800: ITP: kernel-patch-acpi -- Advanced ACPI support for the Linux kernel Bug reopened, originator not changed. > thanks

Bug#172800: kernel-patch-acpi

On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 08:45:54PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > So? I am busy. Take it over if you want it, or exercise patience. I'd > prefer if you take it because ACPI on my laptop is broken anyways... I understand. But you asked why _I_ was filing a bug. I filed no bug. -- - mdz

Bug#172799: Bug#172800: kernel-patch-acpi

also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.11.1444 +0100]: > Er...take a look at the submitter address, there, cowboy. > > Severity: wishlist; Package: wnpp; Reported by: martin f krafft > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 17:48:11 UTC; Severity: > wishlist; Package: wnpp; R

Bug#172800: kernel-patch-acpi

On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 09:24:48AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > close 172799 > close 172800 > thanks > > also sprach Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.02.10.0039 +0100]: > > Do you still plan to package this? > > why are you filing a bug. Er...take a look at the submitter address, the

Processed: Re: Bug#172800: kernel-patch-acpi

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > close 172799 Bug#172799: ITP: ospmd -- ACPI power management daemon Bug closed, send any further explanations to martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > close 172800 Bug#172800: ITP: kernel-patch-acpi -- Advanced ACPI support for the Linux kernel Bug clo