Bug#170637: gmail

2003-07-04 Thread Bas Zoetekouw
Hi Filip! You wrote: > I was just going through somewhat old (well, not that old, but still) wnpp > bugs, checking for orphaned packages which appeared to not be developed > upstream anymore too. Ah, very nice. [about gmail] > I'll leave it as it is, but I suppose if noone has taken over it mig

Bug#170637: gmail

2003-07-04 Thread Filip Van Raemdonck
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 06:52:28PM +0200, Ove Kaaven wrote: > fre, 04.07.2003 kl. 12.48 skrev Filip Van Raemdonck: > > > > Regarding you orphaning gmail: I've checked and it appears _really_ dead > > upstream, even it's website is gone. > > Considering that the main feature are probably vfolders,

Bug#170637: gmail

2003-07-04 Thread Ove Kaaven
fre, 04.07.2003 kl. 12.48 skrev Filip Van Raemdonck: > Hi, > > Regarding you orphaning gmail: I've checked and it appears _really_ dead > upstream, even it's website is gone. > Considering that the main feature are probably vfolders, and other MUAs > have that too now; that you say yourself it doe

Bug#170637: gmail

2003-07-04 Thread Filip Van Raemdonck
Hi, Regarding you orphaning gmail: I've checked and it appears _really_ dead upstream, even it's website is gone. Considering that the main feature are probably vfolders, and other MUAs have that too now; that you say yourself it doesn't even build anymore, and the deadness of it, would you mind i