Hi,
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 22:16, Doug Lea wrote:
> I'll see if I can get the Sun legal folks to make some kind of
> clarification. Any suggestions about what in particular I should ask for?
I think the minimal change would be to just ask for changing the word
"non-transferable" to "transferable"
> I had hoped that we could use the earlier work of Professor Lea as basis
> for this package since I assumed it was all in the public domain. But if
> those classes are based on Suns code we will have to rewrite these from
> scratch.
That would be utterly stupid; in part because I contributed to
Hi,
On Tue, 2002-10-01 at 06:30, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:57:47PM -0400, Steven Barker wrote:
> > The package will already be going into contrib because several of the
> > classes depending on the Java2 Container API. I just don't want it
> > to be relegated to non-fre
[I hope Mr. Lea doesn't mind the CC.]
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 10:57:47PM -0400, Steven Barker wrote:
[snip]
> I wrote Prof. Lea and asked if he has permission to distribute these
> classes, and how this permission might apply to Debian. He sent me
> the text of a license he has signed with Sun:
>
Hello debian-legal,
I've got some questions about the legal status of a small portion
of a package I'm working on, libconcurrency-java (containing the java
package EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent). The upstream author, Doug
Lea has put all of his code into the public domain. However, a few
of t
5 matches
Mail list logo
