On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 02:39:30PM -0400, Jay Oliveri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> Chapter 13.1 of the Debian Policy states that a symbolic link can be
> created against undocumnted.7.gz, but I don't know exactly where this
> should go in debian/rules.
>
> Any advice?
If you're us
Hi.
I have an almost working ./debian subdir. The only errors I am getting
are due to missing manpages.
I intend on writing them, but for now I don't want that in itself to
hold up possible packaging of the tools, since everything else seems to
be in working order.
Chapter 13.1 of the Debian
On Wednesday 13 March 2002 06:18 am, Robert Millan wrote:
> El dc, 13 mar 2002 00:37:02 Jay Oliveri ha escrit:
> > On Wednesday 06 March 2002 04:38 pm, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > Well, in fact it'd be better if you take the packaging
> > > because communication and integration with upstream surely
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 06:48 am, Robert Millan wrote:
> Hello!
>
> David McNab just told me that you're now maintainer
> of fcptools.
Yup.
> Is it okay for you if I package it for the Debian
> distribution? You'd benefit from feedback including
> bug reports, patches and ideas for new feature
Hello!
David McNab just told me that you're now maintainer
of fcptools.
Is it okay for you if I package it for the Debian
distribution? You'd benefit from feedback including
bug reports, patches and ideas for new features.
p.s. please keep the CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] when responding
David: It
Hello!
David McNab just told me that you're now maintainer
of fcptools.
Is it okay for you if I package it for the Debian
distribution? You'd benefit from feedback including
bug reports, patches and ideas for new features.
p.s. please keep the CC to [EMAIL PROTECTED] when responding
Cheers,
6 matches
Mail list logo
