Bug#133649: cm-super packaging

2003-02-11 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mar 11/02/2003 à 01:11, C.M. Connelly a écrit : > The README file for CM-Super says > >Each Type 1 font program contains ALL glyphs from the following >standard LaTeX font encodings: T1, TS1, T2A, T2B, T2C, X2, and >also Adobe StandardEncoding (585 glyphs per non-SC font and 468 >

Bug#133649: cm-super packaging

2003-02-10 Thread C.M. Connelly
"JM" == Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JM> Le lun 10/02/2003 à 22:53, C.M. Connelly a écrit : >> FYI, these packages are going to be pretty big. Without >> the AFMs, the package is around 57 MB,~59 MB installed . >> The AFM package will probably be a lot smaller, but

Bug#133649: cm-super packaging

2003-02-10 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lun 10/02/2003 à 22:53, C.M. Connelly a écrit : > FYI, these packages are going to be pretty big. Without the AFMs, > the package is around 57 MB,~59 MB installed . The AFM package > will probably be a lot smaller, but the AFMs themselves are 53 MB > ungzipped. Isn't it possible to split out

Bug#133649: cm-super packaging

2003-02-10 Thread C.M. Connelly
"CMC" == C.M. Connelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "JM" == Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CMC> I've packaged cm-super. I'm having a couple of CMC> conffile-related issues I want to try to resolve before CMC> uploading the packages, but it seems to work ``right out of CMC> the box''

Bug#133649: cm-super packaging

2003-02-10 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lun 10/02/2003 à 17:43, C.M. Connelly a écrit : > I've packaged cm-super. I'm having a couple of conffile-related > issues I want to try to resolve before uploading the packages, but > it seems to work ``right out of the box'' with teTeX 2.0. (It's > dependent on teTeX 2.0 because we have a s

Bug#133649: cm-super packaging

2003-02-10 Thread C.M. Connelly
"JM" == Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> JM> Le mer 05/02/2003 à 04:05, C.M. Connelly a écrit : >> If you don't package it, I probably will. I'm part of the >> teTeX group, as well, so we'd get some cooperation from >> them. ;-) >> >> On the other hand, I'm happy to

Bug#133649: cm-super packaging

2003-02-05 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mer 05/02/2003 à 04:05, C.M. Connelly a écrit : > If you don't package it, I probably will. I'm part of the teTeX > group, as well, so we'd get some cooperation from them. ;-) > > On the other hand, I'm happy to let someone else do the work if > they'd rather. > > I only heard about this pac

Bug#133649: cm-super packaging

2003-02-04 Thread C.M. Connelly
"JM" == Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Josselin, JM> I'm also interested in packaging the cm-super fonts, and JM> it seems possible to do since the latest changes in the JM> tetex packages. JM> Are you still interested in this package, and are you JM> planning to relea

Bug#133649: cm-super packaging

2003-01-09 Thread Michaël Grünewald
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm also interested in packaging the cm-super fonts, and it seems > possible to do since the latest changes in the tetex packages. This is lucky ! > Are you still interested in this package, and are you planning to > release something soon ? Being

Bug#133649: cm-super packaging

2003-01-09 Thread Josselin Mouette
I'm also interested in packaging the cm-super fonts, and it seems possible to do since the latest changes in the tetex packages. Are you still interested in this package, and are you planning to release something soon ? Regards, -- .''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\ : :' :