Bug#1003130: ITP: luit in 2013.

2022-01-22 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 11:30:07AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 03:23:13PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 03:26:13PM +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > ... > > > If not, I don't see a point in creating a separate package for it. And I > > actually as I

Bug#1003130: ITP: luit in 2013.

2022-01-07 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 03:23:13PM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 03:26:13PM +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote: ... > > If not, I don't see a point in creating a separate package for it. And I actually as I understand Debian policy, it would have to be a separate package because th

Bug#1003130: ITP: luit in 2013.

2022-01-05 Thread Thomas Dickey
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 03:26:13PM +0200, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > On 4.1.2022 20.48, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 11:46:03AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: > > > Package: x11-utils > > > Version: 7.7+5 > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > Dear Maintainer, > > > > > > * x11-utils

Bug#1003130: ITP: luit in 2013.

2022-01-05 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 4.1.2022 20.48, Thomas Dickey wrote: On Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 11:46:03AM -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote: Package: x11-utils Version: 7.7+5 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, * x11-utils copy of luit was superseded by luit 2.0 in 2013. * mentioned this several times to developers in X Stri